|
Architect
|
I still don't know what new things Vista is actually offering. I mean, for like 200-300 bucks I sure would like to know why I supposedly would want it so bad. Besides having a different look (which can also already been done in XP, with an extra program that is) why is it or could it be better then XP?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Meh.
|
|
i recently bought a new laptop. windows xp works fine. its fine for me as long as games and stuff runs on it. probably he next time i buy a laptop, they'll include a newer operating system..
thing about vista is that they rushed the release on it if i recall...so it wasn't fully tested and its extremely glitchy and buggy. incompatibility issues were the most thing people had problems with. one of my friends bought vista and tried it, computer was crashing and stuff wouldn't run and he returned it... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Pikachu REEKS!!!
|
XP Rocks!
Besides that is those different types of Linux out there (Red Hat, Fedora, the user-friendly Ubuntu, etc.) that are free (yes, F R E E). You can get many of them from Linux Online, but make sure you start reading the stuff before you do something wrong. <EDIT START> dumbducky posted while I was preparing my post. dumbducky, if you are talking about using Windows only, then let me tell you that Linux can look and feel like Windows. <EDIT END> ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
[/QUOTE]
Very very wrong. They didn't rush it at all(besides some skimping on features). In fact they delayed it behind the holiday release. The incompatibility issues are things that are just gonna happen. Vista revamps everything so much for security sake, that some programs that used malicious ways of doing things just don't work anymore. Programmer's that did things retarded had there applications not work right. Plus some driver issues because Vista rewrote the sound driver implementation to reduce crashes, and rewrote graphic driver implementation to reduce crashes, make graphics more consistent between cards, make it easier for programmers, and speed. Beyond that most drivers should work just fine. Not really. Yeah it can emulate the look. However Vista really does integrate a lot into it all. You can really customize a lot more on explorer, and the usability has been vastly improved on explorer. Furthermore, usually those extra programs arn't really hardware accelerated to the fullest and usually are quite slow. Most applications work perfectly fine with Vista. Older and Newer. The only programs that don't are some anti-virus programs or programs that require certain XP kernal functions(which most shouldn't except anti-virus programs). This reason really isn't valid. The only reason not to get Vista is because you're satisifed with Xp, or whatever OS you're running. XP is a great OS and Vista doesn't bring all that much more to the table. However, Vista is still a fantastic OS and better than XP. To go further and slam Vista for *bugs, crashes, etc* is retarded and untrue. Especially if you havn't used Vista RC2 or Final release Vista over the course of at least a month. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I had some examples of a couple of these that I posted somewhere. I'll see if I can find where it was that I posted them... -EDIT- Ah, here it is: http://www.staredit.net/?findpost=6323 The two things I mention there are a couple of the big ones, things having been done wrong in various third-party programs for years. On a related note, I recently read something from Microsoft that running all users in non-admin mode by default in Vista is partly for protecting Windows but then partly to get programmers to clean up their act, as far as where they make their programs store data and settings, etc. and getting them to minimize or eliminate usage of things that require administrative access. This post was edited 2 times, last edit by ShadowFlare: Sep 14 2007, 11:34 am.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |