Staredit Network > Forums > Lite Discussion > Topic: Should we keep researching code execution?
Should we keep researching code execution?
Jun 30 2014, 11:08 pm
By: trgk  

Jun 30 2014, 11:08 pm trgk Post #1



Custom code injection : Let users create their own code(dll, exe) and put it inside your map, making code auto-executed as their map run.

Custom code execution can enable everything you've imagined in SC. You can even recreate Leauge of Legend in SC. Everything is possible.
But Custom code execution may compromise security severely. You can also create virus in SC. Everything is possible.

So, should research for custom code execution be continued?

Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Jul 1 2014, 12:56 am by trgk. Reason: Clarification.



EUD

Jul 1 2014, 6:30 am TF- Post #2



If another security breach is created then it will be patched out relatively soon, Blizzard has the source code but will never use it to add something to sc1, only to protect their dignity by keeping the game barely functional.




Jul 1 2014, 1:56 pm Sand Wraith Post #3

she*

Would this require a different SCBW executable? I don't understand SCBW's normal map process, so I'm just unsure as to how you can actual inject code that will be executed into a map.




Jul 1 2014, 3:12 pm jjf28 Post #4

Oh bother...

Abusing overflows, how else? http://www.staredit.net/topic/16427/ note that my exe launching outline lacks many non-zero'd values that need to be worked backwards from, and an example map which I've neglected to complete.

As for my part i'll press forward with discoveries and trust mapmakers; no one abused EUDA's before they were patched to make a virus AFAIK, and it was 400x less work back then to launch executable code.



Rs_yes-im4real - Clan Aura - jjf28.net84.net

Reached the top of StarCraft theory crafting 2:12 AM CST, August 2nd, 2014.

Jul 1 2014, 4:27 pm Sacrieur Post #5

Still Napping

Do it for science!

Blizzard will just have to patch the game.



None.

Jul 1 2014, 4:38 pm Black_Overseer Post #6



So what are you afraid of?




Jul 1 2014, 4:43 pm Azrael Post #7



"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds."




Jul 1 2014, 6:13 pm NudeRaider Post #8

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Quote from Sacrieur
Do it for science!

Blizzard will just have to patch the game.
At this point I think they'll rather just close down bnet for sc1 and declare it dead.




Jul 2 2014, 6:44 am TF- Post #9



Quote from NudeRaider
Quote from Sacrieur
Do it for science!

Blizzard will just have to patch the game.
At this point I think they'll rather just close down bnet for sc1 and declare it dead.
And opensource the game as consolation :wtfawesome:




Jul 2 2014, 9:01 am trgk Post #10



My opinion :
1. People can't avoid downloading executable code if there is one in the map they're playing.
2. We cannot revert exploit disclosure once it is disclosed.
(It have already been disclosed in rather very cryptic manner. I understand it though with some difficulties)
3. Exploits shouldn't be disclosed until they are fixed to prevent possible abuses.
But Blizzard won't fix SC. (I would be very happy if they would) Therefore shouldn't disclose the method for it.
4. People may do research, but they shouldn't distribute "How to put your own DLL inside your map in 10 minutes" manual things.

cf) Blizzard patching SC1 again? 1.16.2? They dropped SC1 support several years before. I think that's just a false hypothesis;



EUD

Jul 2 2014, 10:35 am LoveLess Post #11

Let me show you how to hump without making love.

Make a map that has an EUDA enabler, injecting the needed bits into the players' StarCraft, then you can stop research.



None.

Jul 2 2014, 8:07 pm Azrael Post #12



Quote from LoveLess
Make a map that has an EUDA enabler, injecting the needed bits into the players' StarCraft, then you can stop research.

Alright, my ears just officially perked up :P




Jul 2 2014, 9:09 pm iCCup.xboi209 Post #13



Quote from LoveLess
Make a map that has an EUDA enabler, injecting the needed bits into the players' StarCraft, then you can stop research.
this




Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[04:25 pm]
Roy -- payne
payne shouted: setting the value of "branchSize" to "1.5" in Unity automatically adds the "f" required to make it consider a float variable? I've no idea how to make my LINE TWO to work by calling the variable. How do I call it properly?
You'd get a compile error if you tried to do "float branchSize = 1.5;" because that'd be trying to set a double as a float variable without explicitly casting.
[03:53 pm]
m.0.n.3.y -- frdf
[03:46 pm]
BeatMeistro -- NudeRaider
NudeRaider shouted: Oh_Man I don't like it either, but obviously Dem0n does, so why make him remove it. Live and let live.
Yeah, i mean i guess he finds Quicksand Face Obama funny for some reason.
[03:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- Oh_Man
Oh_Man shouted: Demon ur pic is nastay change that shit bro
I don't like it either, but obviously Dem0n does, so why make him remove it. Live and let live.
[02:35 pm]
Oh_Man -- whats up
[02:34 pm]
Vrael -- have not heard me such fine vernacular in a hog's age
[02:34 pm]
Vrael -- wow, quote of the month: "gorb UU bush gonna cop a tude"
[02:32 pm]
Vrael -- oh, I'm in no way familiar with C#, you got me there
[02:30 pm]
Dem0n -- Bruh that's C# LMAO
[02:19 pm]
Vrael -- payne
payne shouted: setting the value of "branchSize" to "1.5" in Unity automatically adds the "f" required to make it consider a float variable? I've no idea how to make my LINE TWO to work by calling the variable. How do I call it properly?
step 1: stop using java
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Roy, NudeRaider, Oh_Man, Ashamed, SegFault, Dem0n