|
True.
8GB of RAM, 3.2ghz Dual Core Intel Xeon in a workstation board 1033FSB, 150GB Raptor SATA, Radeon 2900HD XT Are you some kind of fucktard? What is the point of a demo other than to DEMOnstrate the game. The whole point of a demo is to make people want your game, not hate it. Dipshit. Please, let me in on your secrets. Meh, even with everything maxed out, 8x AA, and 1680x1050 resolution it was not nearly as impressive as I thought it would be. It looks horrifyingly bad actually. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Grab and then punch? Grabbing is necessary eh? I was not doing that.
I couldn't find any definitively legitimate benchmarks for Crysis. The only benchmarks I could find compared the HD2900XT to the 8800GTX, which stated the the 2900 was better. Those benchmarks are supposedly a hoax however, which I am willing to believe. The 2900 should not be , it is significantly cheaper than the 8800. This is the best I can do for card to card comparisons: http://www.engadget.com/2007/04/24/atis-radeon-hd-2900-xt-benchmarked-trumps-nvidias-geforce-880/ Here is some stuff about Crysis raping the 8800. AA is impossible to use with this game: http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2007/10/29/inq-grills-8800gt-dx10-hit I'm pretty sure I'm not losing out in life by filling the few minutes between classes by posting on websites. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
You sir are ill informed. nVidia's cards have been moderately faster, albeit more expensive, for some time. ATI has generally been regarded as being better on the driver-side of things*. Which is to say, you will never run into a game that an ATI card is not compatible with. That has happened to me on more than one occasion with nVidia cards though. Regardless, the problem is not a compatibility issue, and the game rapes both nVidia and ATI cards.
*On that note I have been extremely disappointed in the lack of a feature for disabling scaling for widescreen monitors. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |