So for example if someone replied to my question with a key word like "Site Operation" related to the SC2 editor, either the poster would have the ability to hint to staredit.net this should be in the wiki, or staredit.net would automatically sense this and provide an explanation bubble when a user hovers over the text or a link to the full wiki pages.
Then forum questions and replies could be a lot easier to follow and understand.
http://www.staredit.net/topic/12325/
None.
If the poster could mark it as "sense-able" text, then why wouldn't they just link to the relevant wiki article? This feature would be redundant.
And auto-detection would very quickly become a nuisance, not to mention the lag that would likely happen because the site would be running (what would eventually become) a whole dictionary of keyword matches on every post.
None.
I do stuff and thingies... Try widening and reducing the number of small nooks and crannies to correct the problem.
I find that annoying. I hate that bubbles.
What bubbles?
Our wiki doesn't have a strong base right now, and as long as people don't update it, it will fall into disuse. I'm all for ways to make it more likely to be wikified, but certainly not bubbles. Perhaps a wiki tag, but as it stands now, we have 2 separate wikis.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
What bubbles?
Our wiki doesn't have a strong base right now, and as long as people don't update it, it will fall into disuse. I'm all for ways to make it more likely to be wikified, but certainly not bubbles. Perhaps a wiki tag, but as it stands now, we have 2 separate wikis.
People DO actually update the wiki quite a bit
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
auto-detection would very quickly become a nuisance, not to mention the lag that would likely happen because the site would be running (what would eventually become) a whole dictionary of keyword matches on every post.
Shouldn't lag that much. Offline caching + client-side scripting could offload a vast bulk of that work from the server.
None.
The problem would probably be that several things would not be sensed, IE, something with a bit different spelling (Such as behavior versus behaviour), or things with different capitalization. Not only that but poking the wiki to see if the article exists could become very resource intensive, as the parser would have to check every combination of words in the post to see if it exists in the wiki, while also performing BBCode transformations, etc. It probably wouldn't work.
I would be down for a Wiki BBCode, maybe with some hint text on it, but that would be about it, at least all that is feasible.
None.
People DO actually update the wiki quite a bit
5 pages edited in the past 30 days...
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
People DO actually update the wiki quite a bit
5 pages edited in the past 30 days...
http://www.staredit.net/starcraft2/Special:RecentChanges
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."