Members in Shoutbox
None.

Shoutbox Search
Search for:


Shoutbox Commands
/w [name] > Whisper
/r > Reply to last whisper
/me > Marks as action

Shoutbox Information
Moderators may delete any and all shouts at will.
Global Shoutbox
Please log in to shout.
Pages: < 1 « 1852 1853 1854 1855 18563539 >

[2016-3-03. : 3:40 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Dem0n
Dem0n shouted: ONLY GENIUSES CAN SOLVE THIS! DON'T LOOK IN THE COMMENTS! 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 x 0 + 1 = ??
I prefer 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 + x + + + +
[2016-3-03. : 3:38 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Dem0n
Dem0n shouted: Idiots, it's 4 and 1/4, obviously.
I don't know (1/4pi)/3 radians
[2016-3-03. : 3:37 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Mini Moose 2707
Mini Moose 2707 shouted: I dunno, I was feeling -5 and 7 myself.
I prefer not to have to subtract, or use stupid angles
[2016-3-03. : 3:37 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- woo, 100%
[2016-3-03. : 3:30 am]
BloodyZombie117 -- Math humor by Roy. :wob:
[2016-3-03. : 3:30 am]
Roy -- That's not rational.
[2016-3-03. : 3:29 am]
lil-Inferno -- No it's pi and 0.8938055098.
[2016-3-03. : 3:29 am]
BloodyZombie117 -- Distribution is multiplication... So no, it does not trump division.
[2016-3-03. : 3:29 am]
Roy -- The answer is actually 5 and -0.5.
[2016-3-03. : 3:28 am]
lil-Inferno -- Dem0n
Dem0n shouted: ONLY GENIUSES CAN SOLVE THIS! DON'T LOOK IN THE COMMENTS! 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 x 0 + 1 = ??
1
[2016-3-03. : 3:28 am]
Dem0n -- Idiots, it's 4 and 1/4, obviously.
[2016-3-03. : 3:26 am]
Moose -- I dunno, I was feeling -5 and 7 myself.
[2016-3-03. : 3:25 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- 3 and 1, nevermind
[2016-3-03. : 3:24 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- what's x and y if 3x+4y=13?
[2016-3-03. : 3:08 am]
Dem0n -- ya forget I said that lmaooo
[2016-3-03. : 3:08 am]
Dem0n -- jk IDK LMAO
[2016-3-03. : 3:07 am]
Dem0n -- BloodyZombie117
BloodyZombie117 shouted: 6 / 3(1+2) = 6. woo.
....doesn't distribution trump division
[2016-3-03. : 3:06 am]
Moose -- 6 / 3(1+2) = 6 / 3(3) = 6/33 = 2/11. Fucking casuals.
[2016-3-03. : 3:02 am]
BloodyZombie117 -- 6 / 3(1+2) = 6. woo.
[2016-3-03. : 3:01 am]
BloodyZombie117 -- I got one: No.
[2016-3-03. : 3:00 am]
jjf28 -- BloodyZombie117
BloodyZombie117 shouted: I just wanted to feel smart.
come up with a mnemonic for http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_precedence and you get infinite smart points :P
[2016-3-03. : 3:00 am]
Dem0n -- ONLY GENIUSES CAN SOLVE THIS! DON'T LOOK IN THE COMMENTS! 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 x 0 + 1 = ??
[2016-3-03. : 2:59 am]
Dem0n -- Facebook has reminded me how many idiots don't remember PEMDAS.
[2016-3-03. : 2:59 am]
BloodyZombie117 -- I just wanted to feel smart.
[2016-3-03. : 2:59 am]
BloodyZombie117 -- :wob:
[2016-3-03. : 2:59 am]
BloodyZombie117 -- Remember, it's P-E-MD-AS. Whereas the double letters are equal priority (M and D, then A and S) and must be done left to right.
[2016-3-03. : 2:58 am]
jjf28 -- FaRTy1billion
FaRTy1billion shouted: It just asks for "rationale", so I wonder if that would be acceptable
show them a program in assembly that proves it :wob:
[2016-3-03. : 2:49 am]
lil-Inferno -- imo
[2016-3-03. : 2:40 am]
Moose -- Yeah, also keep in mind you're at the level where people need to take the courses for basic degrees requirements and shit. If you go on, you get to the people who take it for science degrees. Then if you go all out, you get the people who are taking it for a math degree and/or who actually enjoy it.
[2016-3-03. : 2:37 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- so some stuff in college math is dumb, but at least it doesn't focus on the dumb stuff too long
[2016-3-03. : 2:36 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- :moose:
[2016-3-03. : 2:33 am]
Moose -- :farty:
[2016-3-03. : 2:32 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- but I think I have the missing ones now, thanks to you
[2016-3-03. : 2:32 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I wrote out all the steps and solved all of these, and then was just like "I have no idea how to describe what I just did" ;o
[2016-3-03. : 2:31 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- there's just all this weird division and adding stuff sprinkled throughout. But I think I got it, so I'll do it tomorrow
[2016-3-03. : 2:30 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- oh, I dunno
[2016-3-03. : 2:30 am]
Moose -- No, I mean which step
[2016-3-03. : 2:30 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- all of it
[2016-3-03. : 2:30 am]
Moose -- LMAO. Which one is that?
[2016-3-03. : 2:29 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- how about "division and addition shit that I'm sure makes sense but I can't be assed to define it"
[2016-3-03. : 2:29 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- ok
[2016-3-03. : 2:29 am]
Moose -- Yes, you removed the common factor of 1/c from the terms a/c and b/c
[2016-3-03. : 2:28 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- so a/c + b/c = (a+b)/c is factoring?
[2016-3-03. : 2:28 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- anyway, let's see how many trig identities I remember !
[2016-3-03. : 2:28 am]
Moose -- No, it's factoring
[2016-3-03. : 2:27 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Mini Moose 2707
Mini Moose 2707 shouted: Yeah, you are distributing 1/c to both terms of a + b
Mini Moose 2707
Mini Moose 2707 shouted: 3: Definition of exponentiation and the distributive property, probs
so is the opposite also distributing? xD
[2016-3-03. : 2:26 am]
BloodyZombie117 -- The only way is Up
[2016-3-03. : 2:25 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- c-1
[2016-3-03. : 2:24 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I fucked that up
[2016-3-03. : 2:24 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- because it's basically c[sup-1[/sup](a+b) or whatever
[2016-3-03. : 2:24 am]
Moose -- Yeah, you are distributing 1/c to both terms of a + b
[2016-3-03. : 2:23 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- oh, is (a+b)/c = a/c + b/c distributing? I called it that because it made sense
[2016-3-03. : 2:23 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I think I liked Mini Moose 2707
Mini Moose 2707 shouted: 3: Fucking multiplying shit out and then combining under a common denominator
better
[2016-3-03. : 2:22 am]
Moose -- 3: Definition of exponentiation and the distributive property, probs
[2016-3-03. : 2:22 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- anyway, I should instead be more concerned about my test due tonight. xD This is just some stupid bullshit paper that exists only to annoy me
[2016-3-03. : 2:20 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I'm aware of the rules, but I don't know the names and it's hard to just search like "that thing where you add numbers but you can do it differently and it will give the same result"
[2016-3-03. : 2:20 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I remember this being brought up in like middle school, but I didn't care so I didn't pay any attention D:
[2016-3-03. : 2:19 am]
Moose -- I don't remember because this is all trivial and later on you just do it without these ridiculous justifications. (outside of abstract algebra and working in weird spaces)
[2016-3-03. : 2:18 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Mini Moose 2707
Mini Moose 2707 shouted: It's probably a bad idea to write it that way, though.
That's what I'm worried about. D: It's not really clear how specific we need to be
[2016-3-03. : 2:18 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I don't remember the names of stuff because I failed that class
[2016-3-03. : 2:18 am]
Moose -- It's probably a bad idea to write it that way, though.
[2016-3-03. : 2:18 am]
Moose -- 3: Fucking multiplying shit out and then combining under a common denominator
[2016-3-03. : 2:18 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Mini Moose 2707
Mini Moose 2707 shouted: 5: Commutative Property of Addition
I knew it was called something like that. xD
[2016-3-03. : 2:17 am]
Moose -- 5: Commutative Property of Addition
[2016-3-03. : 2:17 am]
Moose -- Probs LMAO
[2016-3-03. : 2:16 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- So it is multiplicative identity? What about sinx/sinx? Is that called something else?
[2016-3-03. : 2:15 am]
Moose -- 2: Multiplicative Identity, sin(x) = sin(x) * 1 = sin(x) * sin(x) / sin(x)
[2016-3-03. : 2:15 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- I have answers for 1 and 4, but not the rest. xD
[2016-3-03. : 2:15 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- It's the algebra ones that I do know, I just don't know the names or what to write
[2016-3-03. : 2:15 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- ya, ones like that are easy and I have them -- they're from this chapter, so I have the definitions

Pages: < 1 « 1852 1853 1854 1855 18563539 >


Members Online: jun3hong