Guys you've all won. Not only is Sala not a mod, but no one is!
It wasn't really because of this.
Though I suppose it did play a small role.
None.
Where does it say the reason for deleting the post?
None.
Unless you have some "friends" that pretend to be your friend and will "miss" you, but talk smack on you behind your back (Have had my fair share of them from here
)
Kellimus, just because you might act like a fag to many people here and cause them to not like you, doesn't mean the rest of us do.
And for the last time, OS Map will not ruin your map, but of course, none of you have used it who are against it, so you wouldn't know, and wouldn't have the latest version.
The post where I told him to delete his strings was something that NEEDED to be posted, he was having a problem with his strings, and therefore had to edit them, I gave him some programs that could help, and I warned him to back up his map.
None.
And for the last time, OS Map will not ruin your map, but of course, none of you have used it who are against it, so you wouldn't know, and wouldn't have the latest version.
OSMAP is an unprotector, any map that it is being used on is probably already corrupted. If you -do- use it on a map that was never protected in the first place, it will remove a lot of data, however to my knowledge it does not corrupt anything.
OSMAP2 on the other hand apparently has protection abilities and string modification algorithms. Protection is by design the corruption of a map, and apparently the string algorithms are not very good as they corrupt the string section. The purpose of those functions may not be to keep the map actually working and editable however.
None.
As I said, you are out of date, the latest versions of both programs have fixed all the flaws you have posted, don't judge that something is corrupting maps when you actually have no idea.
None.
See I only ever corrupted one map with StarForge and people say it corrupts maps all the time, so in perspective, you saying OSMAP2 corrupts maps, the chance of it happening is properly way less then 50% of the time...
None.
I agree with falkoner here OSmap and OSmap 2 both do not corrupt maps and if you say just because OSmap has a protection source with it then you are agaisnt both Unprotecting and Protecting.Anyways the point is there is no reason to delete posts that deal with OSmap.
None.
Some people don't like OSmap because it opens maps which people can potentially steal. Period. Now we can stop bickering on why OSmap is good/bad and get back on topic which is about the state of moderation on SEN.
None.
See I only ever corrupted one map with StarForge and people say it corrupts maps all the time, so in perspective, you saying OSMAP2 corrupts maps, the chance of it happening is properly way less then 50% of the time...
StarForge removes vital map sections on map load. Any map opened with it is immediately corrupted to an extent.
As I said, you are out of date, the latest versions of both programs have fixed all the flaws you have posted, don't judge that something is corrupting maps when you actually have no idea.
As I said, OSMAP does not corrupt maps and OSMAP2, by definition, corrupts maps. That is what protection is. Corruption.
Anyways the point is there is no reason to delete posts that deal with OSmap.
As I have said, that is not the case.
None.
It seems that it is, as you aren't deleting posts that involve other programs that protect. Don't try to hide behind the barrier of being unbiased, because it is obvious that you are going after posts relating to OS Map and using the cover of 'they corrupt maps' and protecting a map is an option on OS Map 2, not a must, and StarForge does not corrupt them on load, I have no idea where you are getting that load of crap.
None.
If someone told another user to go use ProEdit or Uberation or something to remove strings, it would have been just as dumb as telling them to use OSMAP2 to do so.
Something tells me your primary reason for being pissed is the insanely large number of minerals you had been fined. At the time I was unaware of just how many minerals people were getting for posts so I was just making up numbers on the fly. Regardless, it is my intention, should I be returned to my post, to cleanse the MAA forums into a state of squeaky cleanness.
None.
Something tells me your primary reason for being pissed is the insanely large number of minerals you had been fined. At the time I was unaware of just how many minerals people were getting for posts so I was just making up numbers on the fly. Regardless, it is my intention, should I be returned to my post, to cleanse the MAA forums into a state of squeaky cleanness.
What about your threatening to delete my posts because I was voicing my opinion about the SEN policy? Could we honestly trust you to keep the forums clean of spam or clean of stuff that doesn't have your personal stamp of approval?
None.
SEN has a very clear cut policy about the issues you bring up, and if you really, really want to discuss them you should not be doing so in this topic. You should make a new topic. Preferably not a childish one where you state your own feelings and then demand that no one debate with you about them.
Honestly though, the issues you bring up have been discussed to DEATH and discussing them any further isn't going to get anyone anywhere, so bringing it up again is just spam. The policies are there, if you don't like them go somewhere else.
None.
If they're irrelevant to the topic at hand (though, now, OSMAP would be relevant.... I'm assuming now that when you brought it up, it wasn't yet relevant to this discussion), then he is acting well within his rights.
SEN has a very clear cut policy about the issues you bring up, and if you really, really want to discuss them you should not be doing so in this topic. You should make a new topic. Preferably not a childish one where you state your own feelings and then demand that no one debate with you about them.
Honestly though, the issues you bring up have been discussed to DEATH and discussing them any further isn't going to get anyone anywhere, so bringing it up again is just spam. The policies are there, if you don't like them go somewhere else.
Uh, I never implied that nobody can debate with me, and the policy to be honest is still be decided. The site launched recently and we're still deciding on how things should work and getting feedback.
None.
Something tells me your primary reason for being pissed is the insanely large number of minerals you had been fined. At the time I was unaware of just how many minerals people were getting for posts so I was just making up numbers on the fly. Regardless, it is my intention, should I be returned to my post, to cleanse the MAA forums into a state of squeaky cleanness.
And I care about minerals so much that I gave all of mine to CoB just recently? Ya...
The topics we are bringing up HAVE been discussed, but no one has made any serious decision, we are discussing OS Map because of the rules which you suddenly made up to cover up the fact that you just hate OS Map. Just come out and say it and stop trying to act like you are unbiased.
None.
I hate OSMAP. SEN should not support OSMAP. There.
None.
Thank you. I'm tired of hearing people try to act like they are unbiased, I am biased
FOR OS map, but I have no problem with protection as OS Map makes it useless
.
None.
Protection and unprotection are
so unimportant. You guys should talk about something more relevant.
None.
