Thor
Aug 31 2007, 3:47 am
By: Demented Shaman  

Sep 6 2007, 9:35 pm AdvertisemenT Post #21



The Terran Thor seems absolutely amazing ... although I read somewhere it reacts too slow, and dies fast. I wonder how long each one takes to build.



None.

Sep 7 2007, 2:25 am PCFredZ Post #22



Forget Thor. Mothership has arrived.



None.

Sep 7 2007, 2:57 am Echo Post #23



No one knows if Thor is both air and ground attack? If it didn't that would be a downer for terrans because they would have too much anti-ground.



None.

Sep 7 2007, 5:14 am Sauceover Post #24



i think blizzard has stated it has anti-air. its just supposedly pathetically weak(its lasers)



None.

Sep 7 2007, 6:42 pm Echo Post #25



WOW GG Terrans vs air. Terrans have gotten really strong in land but not on air. I think this game is going to be something like Terran is pro-land, Protoss is pro-air, and zerg is extremely strong in both aspects.



None.

Sep 7 2007, 9:02 pm Sie_Sayoka Post #26



We still havent seen the rest of the terran units or protoss units.



None.

Sep 7 2007, 10:42 pm Echo Post #27



We already have the list of all the units that are going to be released. But we have like a little chance that they might be removed or edited.



None.

Sep 7 2007, 11:02 pm Sie_Sayoka Post #28



=o show me



None.

Sep 8 2007, 1:37 am Echo Post #29



It was in some site. They got it from some korean site that was translated with pictures and all.



None.

Sep 8 2007, 3:14 am Sauceover Post #30



"We already have the list of all the units that are going to be released. But we have like a little chance that they might be removed or edited."

ignoring the logical fallacy in it, it's still a VERY ignorant statement.

with statements, unless it comes straight from blizzard, it has 0 credibility. not to mention basic common sense would reason out that a game in pre-alpha would encounter many changes, especially since changes have already occured(and still occurring for that matter).



None.

Sep 8 2007, 3:22 am Echo Post #31



Are you stupid? The sources are from the site is from korean blizzard.

Quote
But we have like a little chance that they might be removed or edited.
Key quote. Shows that I never said it was going to stay like that. It is obvious because many of the units that was in the list were removed, but did exist.



None.

Sep 8 2007, 4:33 am Sauceover Post #32



Quote from EcHo
Quote
But we have like a little chance that they might be removed or edited.
Key quote. Shows that I never said it was going to stay like that. It is obvious because many of the units that was in the list were removed, but did exist.

hence, the logical fallacy part of it.

if the list can be changed, then you do not have "the list of all the units that are going to be released." You have a possible list, but that by no means is a definite guarentee. Disagreeing would be like saying all alpha versions(of things in general) are identical to their final versions.

Quote from EcHo
It is obvious because many of the units that was in the list were removed, but did exist.

you think that they won't add new units? they just added in the firebat today( http://www.battle.net/forums/thread.aspx?fn=sc2-general&t=23162&p=1&#post23162 ). They even said they are "always testing the addition of new units."

keyword: always

Quote from EcHo
Are you stupid? The sources are from the site is from korean blizzard.

so you're trying to 'beat me over the head' with evidence that you didn't provide on request* AND you're saying that Blizz would neglect to put this in english?

*it was made by another person, but that is irrelevant



None.

Sep 8 2007, 6:25 am Echo Post #33



You must be really stupid. I never said they won't add anything else. And yes, blizzard would neglect it in English, just like how they had the conference and showed the units so far in the blizz con in Korea.



None.

Sep 8 2007, 5:34 pm Sauceover Post #34



i'm still waiting on that source btw



None.

Sep 8 2007, 7:48 pm Echo Post #35



Your friend



None.

Sep 9 2007, 8:09 am Sauceover Post #36



you have got to be kidding me...

anyhow...since you've left it to me to find your article...this IS it: http://pc.ign.com/articles/788/788627p1.html

and what do you know...it says nothing about having a final list of units/structures.


in conclusion, you really have no idea what you're talking about



None.

Sep 9 2007, 2:40 pm purple100 Post #37



The opinion on GameFAQs seems to be that the Thor is just a damage sponge, and not really worth using. I think that it's going to be terrific siege weapon along with the tank, although I'm doubting it's usefulness as an air unit.



None.

Sep 9 2007, 2:56 pm Sauceover Post #38



can you link me to that thread?

the thor looks pathetically weak HP-wise.

it absolutely crumbled under attack from like only 5-7 cobras. a single yamato should knock it out of commission(with damage to spare).



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:47 am]
NudeRaider -- lil-Inferno
lil-Inferno shouted: nah
strong
[05:41 am]
Ultraviolet -- 🤔 so inf is in you?
[04:57 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- my name is mud
[04:35 am]
Ultraviolet -- mud, meet my friend, the stick
[10:07 pm]
lil-Inferno -- nah
[08:36 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Inf, we've got a job for you. ASUS has been very naughty and we need our lil guy to go do their mom's to teach them if they fuck around, they gon' find out
[05:25 pm]
NudeRaider -- there he is, right on time! Go UV! :D
[05:24 pm]
lil-Inferno -- poopoo
[05:14 pm]
UndeadStar -- I wonder if that's what happened to me. A returned product (screen) was "officially lost" for a while before being found and refunded. Maybe it would have remained "lost" if I didn't communicate?
[03:36 pm]
NudeRaider -- :lol:
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: 9camilac8523wp6, jjf28, 3miae123rr9, Roy