Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: The best of all OSes
The best of all OSes
Sep 25 2007, 6:53 pm
By: adam2new  

Oct 1 2007, 9:39 pm Nintendo_Confed Post #21



Quote from Excalibur
1. Vista Home Premium x64.
2. XP
3. Linux
4. Fried shit
5. Mac

Quote from ShadowFlare
Windows 2000, XP, and Vista do not do that. It sounds like you are describing Windows 9x/ME. Windows 2000, XP, Vista, etc. are all from different code than Windows 9x/ME, so you can't compare them with each other.
Like a great man once said, when you dont know what to say, just quote someone else..
O and Windows pwns.



None.

Oct 1 2007, 10:08 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #22



Quote
O and Windows pwns
O RLY? Why?



None.

Oct 2 2007, 9:43 am DarkDeserter Post #23



Windows XP, Why? because the only games that don't support it, support only Vista and vista is a ram raping piece of junk. Windows XP is for gamers, Mac is for office work and such, and Linux would be for servers.


In my lone opinion anyway, :unsure: .



None.

Oct 2 2007, 11:24 am Moogle Post #24

Predator of Bed Chambers

I run XP / Linux on two different machines. I found Linux runs more better, less memory leaks, no likely to be hacked, runs stable, less likely even get a virus, takes less memory to run, more secure then most OS. Less crash times. Only problem is doesn't run all games as Windows does, but can be fixed with patches and stuff.

So I'll say linux and for a mac I never use them or touch them. TAINTED EVIL!

Why would someone use Windows 3.1? its memory leak whore!



If all else fails, crowbar the fucker

Oct 3 2007, 2:50 am ToA Post #25

Que Sera, Sera.

Mac os x is my favorite operating system. I dual boot on my iMac with windows xp and mac os x, using xp strictly for games.

Mac os x is a great computer for video editors, photographers, creative stuff.

Linux, not sure what i'd use it for but i'll install it on my machine soon to try it out.


Yeah.




Oct 3 2007, 2:57 am ~:Deathawk:~ Post #26



ToA, why do you consider OS X good for video editors, photographers, and creative stuff..?



None.

Oct 3 2007, 4:23 am ToA Post #27

Que Sera, Sera.

Cause of sources i've read [/edit]

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Oct 3 2007, 5:53 am by ToA.




Oct 3 2007, 12:28 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #28



is that a joke..? lol..?



None.

Oct 3 2007, 1:18 pm spinesheath Post #29



Funny, there was only a single on-topic post yet, amiright?

This thread is about which PARTS of OSes are the best and how to combine them for great pwnage, NOT which already existing OS is "the best".

So... One part to add in has to be Windows' 3rd party support, the other one the free-ness of Linux. High customizability, but still easy to use for newbs. Most other stuff relates to the way the OS handles memory, threads etc., and thus is pretty hard to optimize unless you're a pro on this.



None.

Oct 4 2007, 10:23 pm dumbducky Post #30



I like Windows the best. I use Linux a little, but it's just too confusing. I usually end up having Pie or Doodle walk me through something step by step just to do something. OS X just a piece of crap though.



tits

Oct 6 2007, 4:59 am Twitch Post #31



Quote from dumbducky
I like Windows the best. I use Linux a little, but it's just too confusing. I usually end up having Pie or Doodle walk me through something step by step just to do something. OS X just a piece of crap though.
How the hell can open source be hard t understand thats just wierd.Even my mom for god sakes likes linux better then vista or mac.



None.

Oct 6 2007, 1:02 pm dumbducky Post #32



Well, congratulations to your mom. I was referring to the actual OS, not the fact that it was OS. Just about whenever I wanted to do something like install Java, I had no clue what to do. Being able to look at a source filled with a language I don't understand is useless.



tits

Oct 6 2007, 2:31 pm JordanN Post #33



Windows XP and Windows 98.



None.

Oct 6 2007, 2:42 pm Syphon Post #34



Quote from dumbducky
Well, congratulations to your mom. I was referring to the actual OS, not the fact that it was OS. Just about whenever I wanted to do something like install Java, I had no clue what to do. Being able to look at a source filled with a language I don't understand is useless.

Just use Debian or a fork. Apt-get is so easy to understand. :P

Quote from Akar
Let me explain why windows sucks... You see it takes up resources when it does tasks right? Well it doesn't close the tasks when it is done with them. So it keeps using resources, but than it is also using the ones from the new things it pulls up.
ALSO, Windows doesn't fix its errors until you reboot a couple times, it'll keep saying error messages until it is a pile of shit.

Let me explain why Mac OS X sucks.

It takes up 2gb of memory when idle, and is illegal to boot on non Mac computers. Also, it's just plain shitty.

Every single time I've had to use a Mac the scenario runs something like this; Boot up Mac, naively try to run more than 2 programs at once, crash. I'm sorry to blow your mind, Mac users, but yes, they crash. I have used a Mac a grand total of one time without it crashing.

As for Apple's shitty proprietary computers? Overpriced and underpowered. I just flipped through Newegg rather quickly, and for the same specifications, I could either get a) A $1194.00 iMac MA876LL, or b) A $749.99 Acer Veriton VT6900-UD4400P. And then one lets me run a solid Windows, DOS, Linux, UNIX, Solaris, BSD, or FreeBSD OS, and the other ships with a shiny piece of crap.

For the same price as the iMac, I could buy a computer with 3 times as much memory, a better graphics card, more than twice the HDD capacity, and a better CPU, among other things. Wait, did I say the same price? It's actually almost $50 cheaper. And I can upgrade whenever I feel the need.

If we wanted to, we could boot OS X on a cheaper PC, and it would run better. But Apple doesn't want that because they're more greedy than Microsoft (Gasp.) not that we WOULD want to, because we realise that OSs aren't specialised, they can all do everything you want to, but some do it better. If the people behind the few good programs that are Mac exclusive dedicated themselves to writing Linux/Windows programs, the world might be a nicer place.



None.

Oct 6 2007, 4:15 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #35



lol, installing java is pretty easy.. I find using "Automatix" is sort of useful for new people to get all the basic things, such as java, installed.

I'm not sure where you got your information that Mac OS X uses 2gb on idle, Syphon. I've never heard that claim before... and personal experience shouldn't really be used to measure which operating system is better, because I've crashed tons of times on Windows (a lot are my own fault.. :P) but yeah, both PC and Max OS X crash, obviously.

I wouldn't call Apple greedy, I would just call them interested in making money, which they should be. If they let OS X run on any computer, why would people buy Apple computers?



None.

Oct 6 2007, 6:40 pm Nai Post #36



Bill Gates has said that if he redid his whole start he would manufacture his computers like apple does.
The two programs that have crashed my computer, yes a mac, has been word and ie and netscape aka cross platform programs.
OS X does not use 2gb of memory on idle or else my computer wouldn't run with it's 512mb memory.

And who every said mac sucks for programming is telling a lie. Have you even seen what I have been making?

What I really don't get is why people are so against other os's I have a mac and have no problem with windows.



None.

Oct 6 2007, 6:56 pm Syphon Post #37



Quote from ~:Deathawk:~
I wouldn't call Apple greedy, I would just call them interested in making money, which they should be. If they let OS X run on any computer, why would people buy Apple computers?

They SHOULDN'T, Microsoft gets along just fine without manufacturing computers. And they'd be able to focus on making Mac OS better.

Quote from Nai
And who every said mac sucks for programming is telling a lie. Have you even seen what I have been making?

I just don't know why any programmer in their right mind would want to use OS X as their development workspace. It completely boggles my mind that there are any Mac programs.



None.

Oct 6 2007, 7:12 pm Nai Post #38



Quote from Syphon
any programmer in their right mind would want to use OS X as their development workspace. It completely boggles my mind that there are any Mac programs.
Then you have not programmed on a mac, it's very easy. I learned to program and then got a lot of XEdit done in just 1 week.



None.

Oct 6 2007, 8:05 pm ~:Deathawk:~ Post #39



Quote from Syphon
Quote from ~:Deathawk:~
I wouldn't call Apple greedy, I would just call them interested in making money, which they should be. If they let OS X run on any computer, why would people buy Apple computers?

They SHOULDN'T, Microsoft gets along just fine without manufacturing computers. And they'd be able to focus on making Mac OS better.

Quote from Nai
And who every said mac sucks for programming is telling a lie. Have you even seen what I have been making?

I just don't know why any programmer in their right mind would want to use OS X as their development workspace. It completely boggles my mind that there are any Mac programs.
Are you telling me Apple, as a business, shouldn't be doing what best intrests them? It's all about making money, forget about that "greedy" crap, any other business would do the same. Microsoft doesn't sell their own hardware because it's operating system is already on 99% of the computers sold.

Also, the fact that Apple hardware is uniform helps with stabillity, etc.

Finally, Apple is gaining more market share recently.. They're at like 3rd place in total sales for computer manufactuers. not so sure about that, actually..

Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Oct 7 2007, 2:57 am by ~:Deathawk:~.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2024-4-27. : 9:38 pm]
NudeRaider -- Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet shouted: NudeRaider sing it brother
trust me, you don't wanna hear that. I defer that to the pros.
[2024-4-27. : 7:56 pm]
Ultraviolet -- NudeRaider
NudeRaider shouted: "War nie wirklich weg" 🎵
sing it brother
[2024-4-27. : 6:24 pm]
NudeRaider -- "War nie wirklich weg" 🎵
[2024-4-27. : 3:33 pm]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- o sen is back
[2024-4-27. : 1:53 am]
Ultraviolet -- :lol:
[2024-4-26. : 6:51 pm]
Vrael -- It is, and I could definitely use a company with a commitment to flexibility, quality, and customer satisfaction to provide effective solutions to dampness and humidity in my urban environment.
[2024-4-26. : 6:50 pm]
NudeRaider -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: Idk, I was looking more for a dehumidifer company which maybe stands out as a beacon of relief amidst damp and unpredictable climates of bustling metropolises. Not sure Amazon qualifies
sounds like moisture control is often a pressing concern in your city
[2024-4-26. : 6:50 pm]
Vrael -- Maybe here on the StarEdit Network I could look through the Forums for some Introductions to people who care about the Topics of Dehumidifiers and Carpet Cleaning?
[2024-4-26. : 6:49 pm]
Vrael -- Perhaps even here I on the StarEdit Network I could look for some Introductions.
[2024-4-26. : 6:48 pm]
Vrael -- On this Topic, I could definitely use some Introductions.
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: adelinedfischer, Moose