Hi there... I just have started with tileset-terrain-combinations
a new "high-jugnle-terrain" made of the bridge and outpost
what do you think about this?
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
Take off the grid
And this is basically just the temple terrain therefor not needing to be extended
None.
And this is basically just the temple terrain therefor not needing to be extended
You're blind. Or retarded.
It's nice, although I can see right now that if you took off the grid, it would look a lot blockier than you think it is, whenever terraining, take off your grid, it often makes you think things blend when they do not.
None.
It's nice, although I can see right now that if you took off the grid, it would look a lot blockier than you think it is, whenever terraining, take off your grid, it often makes you think things blend when they do not.
crap.... i made the map as a new map.... made screen -> print -> save picture -> imageshack, uploaded -> posted here...
and guess what...
i closed the map without saving
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
Well, just as a note, if you want to put the bridge on a temple, you're better off using the double temple edge (when you go in to the editor, place a thin strip of temple in an X shape (as thin as it goes, so unwalkable) and then take the interior corners, to create a thin wall thing that does not have grass in the back end, works wonders for terrain.
None.
Well, just as a note, if you want to put the bridge on a temple, you're better off using the double temple edge (when you go in to the editor, place a thin strip of temple in an X shape (as thin as it goes, so unwalkable) and then take the interior corners, to create a thin wall thing that does not have grass in the back end, works wonders for terrain.
didn't really understand.... can you explain it better??
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.
He's saying to use that, and put the bridge on that, instead of just on normal temple terrain.
None.
Well, here's my 3 minute attempt, I'm sure you could dig up better tiles for the edges though.
None.
Although, I did what he did originally, and I was quite impressed with the results:
Maybe it doesn't look as good in back, but it's pretty smexy in the front, just a bit blocky.
None.
Well, here's my 3 minute attempt, I'm sure you could dig up better tiles for the edges though.
looks nice... but if you zoom: blocky but thanks for that hint
Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.