Yes, both players have burrowed checked, and they are allied to everybody.
Only defilers and infesteds do this.
Is there any way to insure that they stay burrowed, or will I just have to not use those types?
None.
I made a cycling system with lots of burrowed units for a map i started, and it seems that certain Zerg units unburrow when given to another player.
Yes, both players have burrowed checked, and they are allied to everybody.
Only defilers and infesteds do this.
Is there any way to insure that they stay burrowed, or will I just have to not use those types?
Yes, both players have burrowed checked, and they are allied to everybody.
Only defilers and infesteds do this.
Is there any way to insure that they stay burrowed, or will I just have to not use those types?
I do stuff and thingies... Try widening and reducing the number of small nooks and crannies to correct the problem.
use p9-11 for the cycling system. they will not unburrow... (I use p10 and p11 in my current project/map "Kaiser")
the problem is, i can't use the players past 8, because then i'll have to double my triggers (instead of using "Force3" i would have to have two triggers, for P9 and P10).
I don't mean the owners of the triggers, i mean in the conditions/actions
e.g.
center loc on lurker owned by Force3
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Dec 28 2007, 6:53 pm by someone09.
I don't mean the owners of the triggers, i mean in the conditions/actions
e.g.
center loc on lurker owned by Force3
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Dec 28 2007, 6:53 pm by someone09.
None.
I do stuff and thingies... Try widening and reducing the number of small nooks and crannies to correct the problem.
then you have to change that, or you need to make the players who own the burrowed units to a neutral player.
They unburrow whether they are neutral or not. It's weird.
EDIT: Wow, I'm stupid. I thought they were set to neutral, but they weren't.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Dec 28 2007, 7:35 pm by someone09.
EDIT: Wow, I'm stupid. I thought they were set to neutral, but they weren't.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Dec 28 2007, 7:35 pm by someone09.
None.
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-9-11. : 9:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/[2026-9-11. : 2:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself[2026-9-11. : 1:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Members Online: Moose
Moose