This is a discussion topic, not Bible class. You can't use a secondhand source as evidence and pretend that there aren't hundreds of other documents from before that time period and throughout the next 2500 years that give not even a cursory mention of dinosaurs, leviathans, behemoths, or whatever you'd like to call them. Though I'm sure you're scarcely aware of it, if not outright frightened by the truth, there were people in the world recording history long before Christians were.
On top of that, no fossil has ever been found of a dinosaur which has died within the last 5000 years. Creationists love to claim evolution isn't disprovable: there's one pretty easy way. Find a SINGLE recent dinosaur fossil. Remember those few hundred transitional fossils on Wikipedia that weren't good enough for you a few days back? Yeah, people supporting your side can't even find one. Care to guess why?
Even ignoring both of those gaping holes in creationist logic, the terrible explanations that creationist sites give for dinosaurs in the bible are easily counterpointed: there were literally thousands of species of dinosaurs that existed. The bible mentions, AT BEST, even going out on massive stretches of word manipulation and outright ignorance of context, three types of dinosaurs. What happened to the other hundreds?
Let's take a look at one nice example of apologists blatantly ignoring their own divinely inspired text. Using your quite condescending Google search, every single link on the first page refers to Job 40:
15 “Look at Behemoth,
which I made along with you
and which feeds on grass like an ox.
16 What strength it has in its loins,
what power in the muscles of its belly!
17 Its tail sways like a cedar;
the sinews of its thighs are close-knit.
18 Its bones are tubes of bronze,
its limbs like rods of iron.
19 It ranks first among the works of God,
yet its Maker can approach it with his sword.
20 The hills bring it their produce,
and all the wild animals play nearby.
That's definitely indicative of a pretty sizable herbivore. Most of the sites then use the evidence of "Its tail sways like a cedar" and the size of a cedar tree to confirm that it is indeed a brontosaurus, completely ignoring the obvious use of metaphor. Sure, I'll even be kind enough to go along with that ridiculous line of reasoning. What troubles me is that somehow, not a single one of those sites manage to mention the next two verses:
21 Under the lotus plants it lies,
hidden among the reeds in the marsh.
22 The lotuses conceal it in their shadow;
the willows of the brook surround him.
... Yeah. It's a brontosaurus, and it hides under small plants. That makes sense. The other common reference to dinosaurs in the bible is that of Leviathan, a seven headed sea monster that breathes fire. I searched for dinosaurs with seven heads that breath fire and surprisingly came up empty. Apologist explanations of dinosaurs in the bible don't even match the bible's description of these dinosaurs.
Think
for
yourself.
Also, you're conveniently ignoring the evidence of evolution I provided to you. You asked for it and cited a source which I took the time to prove completely wrong, and then you ignored me anyway.
None.