Quote from Kellimus
Antisleep said there isn't, so I simply used China as an example to prove my point.
My point being, that there are threats to the United States.
Antisleeps point being, that we are so technologically advanced that we have no threats.
Which is a logical fallacy, and is wrong.
My point being, that there are threats to the United States.
Antisleeps point being, that we are so technologically advanced that we have no threats.
Which is a logical fallacy, and is wrong.
No significant threats that warrant 500 billion dollars per year of military spending, is not "no threats".
Quote from Kellimus
I'm making shit up?
If replying to your posts is "making shit up" then everyone here does a lot of shit-making.
If replying to your posts is "making shit up" then everyone here does a lot of shit-making.
Quote from Kellimus
And how many of our soldiers have died, compared to their 'soldiers'?
A shit ton more.
A shit ton more.
Quote from Kellimus
Quote from AntiSleep
On the battlefield, technology can make a huge difference, it is only useless when facing an invisible enemy(small groups and individuals working independently). Not to mention you completely ignore the economic aspect of war. Just logistically speaking, how do you invade a country of 300 million from across an ocean in which you have neither naval nor air superiority?
I completely ignore the economic aspect of war?
That's why I'm constantly bitching about how Bush is evil, and needs to be shot or impeached?
None.