None.
Huh? I see no bug..
OVERWATCH STATUS GO
The enlarged Google image appears under the YouTube video.
Currently Working On:
My Overwatch addiction.
Currently Working On: My Overwatch addiction.
Back* from the grave
Two smilies in the same post, even with smilies disabled, the second smiley still gets shown as a smiley. 
EDIT: I lied.
EDIT: I lied.
Quote from 
DevliN
DevliNThe enlarged Google image appears under the YouTube video.
Under? Below? It seems perfectly normal to me.
None.
OVERWATCH STATUS GO
Yeah, I guess "behind" might be a better way to phrase it. 
Here's what it looks like for me:
EDIT:
I found this on a different site regarding images showing up behind an embedded YouTube video:
Maybe that will fix it?
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Nov 22 2010, 2:41 pm by DevliN.
Currently Working On:
My Overwatch addiction.
Here's what it looks like for me:
EDIT:
I found this on a different site regarding images showing up behind an embedded YouTube video:
Quote
your YouTube BBCode HTML replacement looks something like this:
Simply add wmode="transparent" after type="application/x-shockwave-flash" so you end up with:
Code
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://{SIMPLETEXT1}youtube.com/v/{SIMPLETEXT2}&hl=en_US&fs=1?rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://{SIMPLETEXT1}youtube.com/v/{SIMPLETEXT2}&hl=en_US&fs=1?rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
Simply add wmode="transparent" after type="application/x-shockwave-flash" so you end up with:
Code
<object width="560" height="340"><param name="movie" value="http://{SIMPLETEXT1}youtube.com/v/{SIMPLETEXT2}&hl=en_US&fs=1?rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://{SIMPLETEXT1}youtube.com/v/{SIMPLETEXT2}&hl=en_US&fs=1?rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="560" height="340"></embed></object>
Maybe that will fix it?
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Nov 22 2010, 2:41 pm by DevliN.
Currently Working On: My Overwatch addiction.
Seems reliable, Devlin. I do know that Flash has different display modes, and the default can cause some issues in some browsers when it comes to overlapping objects. Wasn't aware those kinds of problems still existed, though.
None.
Back* from the grave
[collapse=
[/collapse]
[/collapse]
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
haha awesome pic poison. I can clearly remember when he posted it at our project board how much everyone drooled. 
aka idmontie
Quote from 
Apos
AposTesting if the youtube bug was fixed or not...
Edit: Nope it wasn't... Click the picture to see what I mean.
Edit: Nope it wasn't... Click the picture to see what I mean.
I do stuff and thingies... Try widening and reducing the number of small nooks and crannies to correct the problem.
The youtube + pictures thing works with Opera 11.11 on a Win7 system perfectly and with Firefox 4.1, too.
BUT shrink image to fit window doesn't work properly. It didnt shrink enough. I still had 2 scrollbars but I could only scroll a few pixels vertically.
BUT shrink image to fit window doesn't work properly. It didnt shrink enough. I still had 2 scrollbars
but I could only scroll a few pixels vertically.
I order you to forgive yourself!
[2024-5-06. : 5:02 am]
Oh_Man -- because it adds anotherr level of player decision-making where u dont wanna walk too far away from the medic or u lose healing value[2024-5-06. : 5:01 am]
Oh_Man -- initially I thought it was weird why is he still using the basic pre-EUD medic healing system, but it's actually genius[2024-5-06. : 3:04 am]
Ultraviolet -- VraelVrael shouted: I almost had a heart attack just thinking about calculating all the offsets it would take to do that kind of stuff
With the modern EUD editors, I don't think they're calculating nearly as many offsets as you might imagine. Still some fancy ass work that I'm sure took a ton of effort[2024-5-05. : 9:35 pm]
Vrael -- I almost had a heart attack just thinking about calculating all the offsets it would take to do that kind of stuff
Members Online: Ultraviolet, Roy
Ultraviolet, Roy