Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: Calculus Hw Help
Calculus Hw Help
Sep 12 2008, 1:11 am
By: grAffe  

Sep 12 2008, 1:11 am grAffe Post #1



Okay, I'm in Calc BC, and I have a hw problem I can't seem to get.
Quote
At time t, t > 0 the volume of a sphere is increasing at a rate proportional to the reciporical of the radius. At t = 0, the radius of the sphere is 1 and at t=15, the radius is 2. Btw the volume of a sphere is V=4/3 pi r^3

a) Find radius as a function of t
b) At what time t will the volume of the sphere be 27 times its volume at t=0?

We JUST learned about the existance of the method of integration, so I don't think you use that here...
If somebody could just... translate this problem from words into math, I could do it. I am just not getting what it's trying to say in equation/proportion form...



None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:21 am Fwop_ Post #2



dV/dT = k/r
dV = (k/r)dT (edit: something seems wrong with that).

Not sure, and too lazy to do it. But then you will be able to set the two V equations equal to each other. It's been a while since I've done those problems, but I think that should get you started.

Edit: I'm rusty, so whatever. I'll try and do it on paper.



None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:27 am grAffe Post #3



Yeah umm any way you can solve this with Calc A knowledge? I just started BC, and I know absolutely nothing about finding integrals other than from geometric shapes...



None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:29 am Fwop_ Post #4



You could try deriving the volume equation to come up with the rate of change of radius.



None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:34 am grAffe Post #5



dV/dt = 4 pi r^2 dr/dt

dr/dt should also be 1/15 because of the slope between the two points given, but this maybe is put in later...

Then... dV/dt = 4 pi r^2 dr/dt = (k/r)?

That's as far as I can go, lol.



None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:37 am Fwop_ Post #6



Yeah, then dr/dt = k/(4 pi r^3).

4 pi r^3 dr = kdt Integrate this.

pi r^4 = kt + C

With the two time values (t=0, r=1 and t=15, r=2) you can solve for k to get the answer to part A.

Again, I'm rusty. I don't think what I'm doing is right (something is seriously wrong, like my dr/dt).

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 12 2008, 1:43 am by Fwop_.



None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:47 am DT_Battlekruser Post #7



Quote
dr/dt should also be 1/15 because of the slope between the two points given, but this maybe is put in later...

No, because r(t) is not linear. It varies with respect to itself.


Fwop got it while I was solving this (he is quite correct), but


General given: dV/dt = k/r

r(0) = 1, r(15) = 2.

V = 4πr3/3

---

By the Chain Rule, dV/dt = (dV/dr)(dr/dt).

dV/dt = 4πr2(dr/dt)

4πr2(dr/dt) = k/r

4πr3dr = k dt

∫4πr3dr = ∫k dt

πr4 = kt + c

r(t) = (kt/π + c)1/4

r(0) = c1/4 = 1; c = 1.

r(t) = (kt/π + 1)1/4

r(15) = (15k/π + 1)1/4 = 2; k = π.

r(t) = (t + 1)1/4

etc.

It's awfully advanced for the first three weeks of a Calc BC course, but once you firmly master the Chain Rule in this situation, it's pretty simple.


Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 12 2008, 1:52 am by DT_Battlekruser.



None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:52 am Fwop_ Post #8



Quote from DT_Battlekruser
General given: dV/dt = 1/r

Don't we assume that dV/dt = k/r?

This is the kind of stuff we did for AB, there were even a couple of these problems on the AP test.



None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:54 am DT_Battlekruser Post #9



Yes, my mistake (I forgot the constant of proportionality and remembered it when that stupid pi was still in the denominator so i didn't correct everything).

Was it in AB? It's been wayy too long :P What do you do in BC?

Quote
I'm taking AP Calc this year and right now we're just learning implicit differentiation. :wtfage: Finished third day of school today.

The trick is not the differentiation, but implementing the Chain Rule based on the givens to see that dV/dt = (dV/dr)(dr/dt). The rest is just by rote. And I could be off on when you learn stuff, but you don't learn the nice big Chain Rule until multivariable, so I tend to think of it as an "advanced concept".




None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:55 am grAffe Post #10



k stands for a constant?



None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:55 am Fwop_ Post #11



Lol BC is just AB on steroids. We've been doing the exact same thing as AB so far. In BC we are supposed to get to integration by parts and La Hospital's Rule, and maybe some more things, I don't know yet.

Edit: Yeah, k is as DTBK said, the constant of proportionality. You do that in, what, Algebra 1? more in 2.



None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:57 am DT_Battlekruser Post #12



Quote from grAffe
k stands for a constant?

Yes, if a is proportional to b, then that's saying a = kb, where k is some constant.

Quote from Fwop_
Lol BC is just AB on steroids. We've been doing the exact same thing as AB so far. In BC we are supposed to get to integration by parts and La Hospital's Rule, and maybe some more things, I don't know yet.

I thought L'Hospital's rule was AB.. have fun memorizing the trig decomposition algorithms when you integrate by parts :) You can always derive them, too.




None.

Sep 12 2008, 1:59 am Fwop_ Post #13



I think it's in the book, but I don't think we ever "officially" learned it. I know I've used it though =p.

We did implicit differentiation in AB. Our teacher was also awesome.

edit: We haven't gotten into anything new since school started, there are a couple kids that skipped AB so we have to slow down for them.



None.

Sep 12 2008, 3:25 am grAffe Post #14



OMG thank you guys for everything! You guys rox!



None.

Sep 12 2008, 3:44 am PCFredZ Post #15



It's preposterous scenario problems like these that give calc a bad name. Who the heck fills a sphere at a rate inversely proportional to the radius?

"Wow this water balloon is getting awfully big. I better fill it up more slowly." Urgh, I guess that's somewhat reasonable.



None.

Sep 12 2008, 4:04 am MillenniumArmy Post #16



Quote from PCFredZ
It's preposterous scenario problems like these that give calc a bad name. Who the heck fills a sphere at a rate inversely proportional to the radius?

"Wow this water balloon is getting awfully big. I better fill it up more slowly." Urgh, I guess that's somewhat reasonable.
Oh it happens quite often. Especially in the field of engineering. Helps with theory and practical applications for the future :P



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[10:09 pm]
Ultraviolet -- let's fucking go on a madmen rage bruh
[10:01 pm]
Vrael -- Alright fucks its time for cake and violence
[2024-5-07. : 7:47 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Yeah, I suppose there's something to that
[2024-5-06. : 5:02 am]
Oh_Man -- whereas just "press X to get 50 health back" is pretty mindless
[2024-5-06. : 5:02 am]
Oh_Man -- because it adds anotherr level of player decision-making where u dont wanna walk too far away from the medic or u lose healing value
[2024-5-06. : 5:01 am]
Oh_Man -- initially I thought it was weird why is he still using the basic pre-EUD medic healing system, but it's actually genius
[2024-5-06. : 3:04 am]
Ultraviolet -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: I almost had a heart attack just thinking about calculating all the offsets it would take to do that kind of stuff
With the modern EUD editors, I don't think they're calculating nearly as many offsets as you might imagine. Still some fancy ass work that I'm sure took a ton of effort
[2024-5-06. : 12:51 am]
Oh_Man -- definitely EUD
[2024-5-05. : 9:35 pm]
Vrael -- I almost had a heart attack just thinking about calculating all the offsets it would take to do that kind of stuff
[2024-5-05. : 9:35 pm]
Vrael -- that is insane
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: m.0.n.3.y, Roy, C(a)HeK