Cheeze: Tell me how you can prove it, so and so forth.
Repeat, ad infinitum.
Let's get a move on with this conversation.
Ok, basically, anti cannot prove evolution, he never said he could, nor has he attempted to do so. Remember, scientific theories are constantly being added to, refined, reformed, adapted, and so forth overtime. It is not claimed to be the perfect, and only possible solution, it is not claimed to be completely proven. (as Anti has indirectly or indirectly said more than once)
Cheeze, there is a testable procedure for a scientific experiment that exists for evolution. It has happened over the last several hundreds of millions of years, and now we are observing it and dechipering it (note all the facts anti has listed here), then making conclusions. In addition, this experiment goes on today and will continue to as long as we exist, it is just a very long, drawn out experiment; it does not necessarily require a definite end in sight for us to begin making our conclusions.
Evolution is something that can be everything save 100% proven based off your definitions. Creationism and ID cannot even attempted to be proven, nor do they really relate in substance to that of Evolution in the first place, only in subject matter. Also, you make a point against your attempt to argue for creationism when you say the Flying Pink Unicorn is as valid as the God that most people believe in, true as it may be. All you're really saying is, "creationism is possible", well, we know that already, as anti has said, that is useless as is.
None.