|
http://www.holysmoke.org/icr-pri.htm - atheists in prison
http://www.adherents.com/adh_dem.html composite US demographics http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?page=article&Article_ID=10961 - divorce rate in bible belt. http://www.teenpregnancy.org/resources/data/brates.asp teen pregnancy rates by state- compare states within bible belt- with those outside it. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I do not respect your beliefs, and I implore you not to respect mine. To ask respect of beliefs held without evidence, is to burn the books of progress and hope.
- The Village IconoClast |
|
also, fix your damn quotes, you should repost any comments other than that last line too.
This post was edited 1 times, last edit by AntiSleep: Oct 26 2007, 9:41 pm.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I do not respect your beliefs, and I implore you not to respect mine. To ask respect of beliefs held without evidence, is to burn the books of progress and hope.
- The Village IconoClast |
|
I have seen and heard the religious indoctrination of children first hand. These people show photos of aborted fetuses to preschoolers, in order to solidify the future political position of the children. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I do not respect your beliefs, and I implore you not to respect mine. To ask respect of beliefs held without evidence, is to burn the books of progress and hope.
- The Village IconoClast |
|
Provide me with reliable sources to the outrageous claims you've spoken of: I have seen and heard the religious indoctrination of children first hand. These people show photos of aborted fetuses to preschoolers, in order to solidify the future political position of the children. And so because of a few "hard-core enthusiasts", you're going to condemn everyone that follows it? That's like calling all Muslims Terrorists because a few of the followers of the religion take it to the extreme... And honestly, I agree with what Steamboy said. ALL atheists I have ever came across, think the same way as the examples he provided. Have you ever thought that maybe you're Agnostic instead of being an Atheist? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Here to Help
|
Actually, he never condemned everyone that follows it, or even implied that. All he said is he doesn't want those "hard-core enthusiasts" to do what they do. Maybe you should read a little more careful. In the meantime, you have done exactly what you accused AntiSleep of just on the last page, and in fact actually did it. Omg hypocrisy! Not that I even believe what you said is true, but that is just one example of you saying something exactly like that out of a few just in your last several posts. Also, steamboy actually did exactly what you were trying to correct anti for a lot worse than either of you, but you didn't mention anything about that. This post was edited 2 times, last edit by Dapperdan: Oct 26 2007, 10:12 pm.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Provide me with reliable sources to the outrageous claims you've spoken of: I have seen and heard the religious indoctrination of children first hand. These people show photos of aborted fetuses to preschoolers, in order to solidify the future political position of the children. And so because of a few "hard-core enthusiasts", you're going to condemn everyone that follows it? That's like calling all Muslims Terrorists because a few of the followers of the religion take it to the extreme... And honestly, I agree with what Steamboy said. ALL atheists I have ever came across, think the same way as the examples he provided. Have you ever thought that maybe you're Agnostic instead of being an Atheist? I am an agnostic as well as an atheist. Agnostic means without knowledge, and atheist means without theistic belief. I have never met a gnostic atheist. Now, it may be that you do not condone violence for religious reasons, but because you refuse to question religious authorities, you stand on a continuum with those who do. Religious moderates give safe harbor to fundamentalist and extremist religious ideas and behavior. It is not as though you have to torture the texts to justify the fundamentalism either, that stuff is really in the bible. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I do not respect your beliefs, and I implore you not to respect mine. To ask respect of beliefs held without evidence, is to burn the books of progress and hope.
- The Village IconoClast |
|
Actually, he never condemned everyone that follows it, or even implied that. All he said is he doesn't want those "hard-core enthusiasts" to do what they do. Maybe you should read a little more careful. In the meantime, you have done exactly what you accused AntiSleep of just on the last page, and in fact actually did it. Omg hypocrisy! Not that I even believe what you said is true, but that is just one example of you saying something exactly like that out of a few just in your last several posts. Also, steamboy actually did exactly what you were trying to correct anti for, but you didn't mention anything about that. It seems you just enjoy arguing with AntiSleep right now. :/ And all you do Dapperdan, is take what people say, twist and construe it so it sounds like you're the smart one. Sorry, but that's not a good way of debating, thank you And, no I didn't. I'm not hard-headed and close-minded in this situation. I believe in god. Other people do not. I do not attack nor say that anyone is stupid for believing or not believing in a higher power (some call it God) unlike a few others in this thread. So therefore, I have done nothing of the sort, in to which you claim I have. Sorry that you failed this time, Dapperdan. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Provide me with reliable sources to the outrageous claims you've spoken of: I have seen and heard the religious indoctrination of children first hand. These people show photos of aborted fetuses to preschoolers, in order to solidify the future political position of the children. And so because of a few "hard-core enthusiasts", you're going to condemn everyone that follows it? That's like calling all Muslims Terrorists because a few of the followers of the religion take it to the extreme... And honestly, I agree with what Steamboy said. ALL atheists I have ever came across, think the same way as the examples he provided. Have you ever thought that maybe you're Agnostic instead of being an Atheist? I am an agnostic as well as an atheist. Agnostic means without knowledge, and atheist means without theistic belief. I have never met a gnostic atheist. Now, it may be that you do not condone violence for religious reasons, but because you refuse to question religious authorities, you stand on a continuum with those who do. Religious moderates give safe harbor to fundamentalist and extremist religious ideas and behavior. It is not as though you have to torture the texts to justify the fundamentalism either, that stuff is really in the bible. I'm sorry that I'm not a blind-sheep who follows others around like you. I don't need to question religion for the purposes that others give, I question it for my own reasons. Something that it seems like you don't. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Kellimus didn't you recently accuse me of ad-hominum attacks, and then of hypocrisy? Do you feel like justifying the claim that I follow the ideas of others anytime soon?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I do not respect your beliefs, and I implore you not to respect mine. To ask respect of beliefs held without evidence, is to burn the books of progress and hope.
- The Village IconoClast |
|
Here to Help
|
I believe in god. Other people do not. I do not attack nor say that anyone is stupid for believing or not believing in a higher power (some call it God) unlike a few others in this thread. So therefore, I have done nothing of the sort, in to which you claim I have. Sorry that you failed this time, Dapperdan. You didn't even address what I said. Sorry, but that's not a good way of debating, thank you Where do I construe something into something it is not? That is exactly what you did just a second ago. He had in fact not said anything about that, but you construed it into that (how, I don't know) by some twisted logic. Right now, in your arguements against both AntiSleep and myself, all you are basically saying is "You're wrong and I cannot be". Sorry, but according to your own logic, this is a total failure in an attempt to argue. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Provide me with reliable sources to the outrageous claims you've spoken of: I have seen and heard the religious indoctrination of children first hand. These people show photos of aborted fetuses to preschoolers, in order to solidify the future political position of the children. And so because of a few "hard-core enthusiasts", you're going to condemn everyone that follows it? That's like calling all Muslims Terrorists because a few of the followers of the religion take it to the extreme... And honestly, I agree with what Steamboy said. ALL atheists I have ever came across, think the same way as the examples he provided. Have you ever thought that maybe you're Agnostic instead of being an Atheist? I am an agnostic as well as an atheist. Agnostic means without knowledge, and atheist means without theistic belief. I have never met a gnostic atheist. Now, it may be that you do not condone violence for religious reasons, but because you refuse to question religious authorities, you stand on a continuum with those who do. Religious moderates give safe harbor to fundamentalist and extremist religious ideas and behavior. It is not as though you have to torture the texts to justify the fundamentalism either, that stuff is really in the bible. I'm sorry that I'm not a blind-sheep who follows others around like you. I don't need to question religion for the purposes that others give, I question it for my own reasons. Something that it seems like you don't. I quote myself so I can explain to you (AntiSleep) what I mean: Uh, no. Just because I "refuse to question religious authorities" (can you read my mind? Damn, I wish I had that power!) doesn't mean that I 'stand on a continuum with those who do' I hate religion because in my eyes, its an easy way to start wars. Just claim you're doing a crusade in the eyes of God, and you're good to go (at least back in ancient times) I don't have to blindly follow around other atheists to hate religion, and not follow it. It comes across as that's the reason as to why you're an "atheist" because of how you said this (a rather ridiculous comment anyways): Now to anyone who can think for themselves and to those who have brains, you've just tried to attack anyone who doesn't follow atheism. With claims that because they don't follow atheism, they agree with what religion does/states. Sorry, but that's a logical fallacy. That is true, for someone who believes and follows "The Holy Bible". Which is something I do not believe in, because of many, many, MANY inconsistencies throughout history when it comes to dealing with Christianity. Anyways, the point I'm trying to get across is: Just because someone doesn't follow the same ideals/beliefs as you, doesn't mean you have the right to try to change their beliefs. EVERY atheist I've ever comes across, does in fact do this. "You're stupid because you believe in God!" "You're intellectually challenged because you believe in a higher power" Atheists harm the world because they're hypocrites. Agnostics don't harm the world, because they're open-minded to everyone's beliefs. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
We? Do you have a turd in your pocket? I just find it funny how atheists speak for their group as a whole... Just like they follow each other blindly with fallacious claims such as "we do not want our tax money to be used blah blah blah blah" Honestly, I think its YOU who doesn't want their tax money used for purposes such as those. Which is a very piss-poor excuse to try to force someone out of their beliefs. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I am against anyone that allows violent memes to exist. If that is you, then so be it.
I never said you were stupid because you believe in god, rather that you are benighted. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I do not respect your beliefs, and I implore you not to respect mine. To ask respect of beliefs held without evidence, is to burn the books of progress and hope.
- The Village IconoClast |
|
And that just proved mine and Steamboy's point of how Atheists are hard-headed, and close-minded. I have a different view/opinion than you. I'm "benighted" because I have a different view/opinion than you. Hence, you're close-minded, and hard-headed, and rather stupid. Stupid because you're so inane enough to claim you don't attack people's views and opinions, but you attack mine by calling me benighted. Thanks for contradicting yourself AntiSleep ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
You are not stupid because of your religion, I know religious people who are intelligent. You are not one of them.
I will try to explain, here is a general model of consciousness(without religion): ![]() the 3 problem memes I identified(Christianity, islam, and dictator cults) can invade any young mind directly through the perceptual filter, by means of appeal to authority, once there it modifies the directives to spread the meme, and it subverts reason out of self preservation. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() I do not respect your beliefs, and I implore you not to respect mine. To ask respect of beliefs held without evidence, is to burn the books of progress and hope.
- The Village IconoClast |
|
Here to Help
|
He NEVER said that, or implied it. I don't need to quote anything, just read something that is in every post he makes, HIS SIGNATURE. So, yeah, you're wrong, again. Just to clarify, he essentially claims that he attacks people's views and opinions, you might not have caught that, he just said he never called anyone stupid for believing in something, etc. etc. I could go on all day. This post was edited 1 times, last edit by Dapperdan: Oct 26 2007, 10:58 pm.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |