CSS issue
Nov 23 2009, 2:05 am
By: sharf  

Nov 29 2009, 12:24 pm Syphon Post #21



Quote from sharf
Well you just said what I want is not accomplishable in CSS. That the content cannot be atleast 100% of the screen, and then stretch beyond it with content without client-side scripting correct? Well I have tables set up that do that, and very well might I add. The only issue is that IE7 and earlier do not recognize the code and therefor does not display it correctly (not sure it picks the way to mess up that it does though) and I'm working on that right now.

CSS can cause semantically correct elements to display like tables, read the link. If you have it set up as semantically incorrect tables, just fix it like that.



None.

Nov 29 2009, 5:14 pm sharf Post #22



The only problem with that is that I am not using CSS, remember? because it can't do what I want. So now I'm using tables, which do what I want, perfectly, it's just that the code I'm using does not work in IE7 and earlier, so I can make a fix that makes it look acceptable in those browsers, but the page looks best in newer browsers.



None.

Dec 5 2009, 3:44 am Syphon Post #23



Quote from sharf
The only problem with that is that I am not using CSS, remember? because it can't do what I want. So now I'm using tables, which do what I want, perfectly, it's just that the code I'm using does not work in IE7 and earlier, so I can make a fix that makes it look acceptable in those browsers, but the page looks best in newer browsers.

Yes, CSS can do what you want, you just don't know to do it.

Tables are semantically incorrect for layout purposes.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[11:31 pm]
Vrael -- :wob:
[08:42 pm]
Ultraviolet -- :wob:
[2024-5-08. : 10:09 pm]
Ultraviolet -- let's fucking go on a madmen rage bruh
[2024-5-08. : 10:01 pm]
Vrael -- Alright fucks its time for cake and violence
[2024-5-07. : 7:47 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Yeah, I suppose there's something to that
[2024-5-06. : 5:02 am]
Oh_Man -- whereas just "press X to get 50 health back" is pretty mindless
[2024-5-06. : 5:02 am]
Oh_Man -- because it adds anotherr level of player decision-making where u dont wanna walk too far away from the medic or u lose healing value
[2024-5-06. : 5:01 am]
Oh_Man -- initially I thought it was weird why is he still using the basic pre-EUD medic healing system, but it's actually genius
[2024-5-06. : 3:04 am]
Ultraviolet -- Vrael
Vrael shouted: I almost had a heart attack just thinking about calculating all the offsets it would take to do that kind of stuff
With the modern EUD editors, I don't think they're calculating nearly as many offsets as you might imagine. Still some fancy ass work that I'm sure took a ton of effort
[2024-5-06. : 12:51 am]
Oh_Man -- definitely EUD
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: DiearAnother, jun3hong, Ultraviolet