Uh what would the app do? Draw random quotes from the website?
None.
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
ya?
Maybe search too?
I'll try making the app myself, though. Might ask you stuff if I need omghalp
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jun 17 2009, 6:02 pm by Corbo. Reason: I shouldn't post if I lack days of sleep
fuck you all
I don't try to come off as rude, i just try to give an honest opinion. Consider incorporating something beyond a minor flash site if you want to excel. Perhaps use flash for the actual navigation, this would allow a lot more possibilities beyond the limitations of a minor flash site.
None.
I don't try to come off as rude, i just try to give an honest opinion. Consider incorporating something beyond a minor flash site if you want to excel. Perhaps use flash for the actual navigation, this would allow a lot more possibilities beyond the limitations of a minor flash site.
Oh ya no worries I didn't think you were rude, I'm actually glad someone gave me a blunt, negative opinion.
None.
@ Syphon: Why? Would you rather it just take time to load and stay black?
@ Centreri: Alright I'll consider it =)
@ Hug: Keep the links on top of the ipod and only have the ipod move? or ipod and title?
No, I'd rather a site be coded properly than be entirely made of useless fucking flash.
None.
@ Syphon: Why? Would you rather it just take time to load and stay black?
@ Centreri: Alright I'll consider it =)
@ Hug: Keep the links on top of the ipod and only have the ipod move? or ipod and title?
No, I'd rather a site be coded properly than be entirely made of useless fucking flash.
ya that was kinda harsh :S
None.
@ Syphon: Why? Would you rather it just take time to load and stay black?
@ Centreri: Alright I'll consider it =)
@ Hug: Keep the links on top of the ipod and only have the ipod move? or ipod and title?
No, I'd rather a site be coded properly than be entirely made of useless fucking flash.
As of right now I could agree that it's useless. As said in another post what you see so far is an outline.
So I would say you need more content and not make everything flash-based (or at least provide an HTML page for people that can't stand flash *cough* Syphon *cough*)
None.
@ Syphon: Why? Would you rather it just take time to load and stay black?
@ Centreri: Alright I'll consider it =)
@ Hug: Keep the links on top of the ipod and only have the ipod move? or ipod and title?
No, I'd rather a site be coded properly than be entirely made of useless fucking flash.
As of right now I could agree that it's useless. As said in another post what you see so far is an outline.
So I would say you need more content and not make everything flash-based (or at least provide an HTML page for people that can't stand flash *cough* Syphon *cough*)
Haha well funny that you say it because I actually just recently planned to do an html page. Hopefully Sy can love me
None.
I don't see how a normal html page would be any more useful, and therefore I don't see how that's a good reason to hate the flash. Better useless pretty flash than useless boring html.
None.
Very well done site.
I don't see many issues with the menus moving, they don't exactly fly away, it's rather good and I like it.
None.
I don't see how a normal html page would be any more useful, and therefore I don't see how that's a good reason to hate the flash. Better useless pretty flash than useless boring html.
Except that flash is less browser friendly and encourages people to make horrid designs that suck.
I can't middle-click to open flash links in new tab. I can't hover over them to see their destination. Unless they for some reason redirect and force me to load another page, which wastes my time, I can't use my browser's back button to return from them; nor can I copy the URL and return to them at any time, from anywhere.
... not that it's of any significance, but isn't the website we're talking about actually Javascript, not flash? >.>
None.
I don't see how a normal html page would be any more useful, and therefore I don't see how that's a good reason to hate the flash. Better useless pretty flash than useless boring html.
Except that flash is less browser friendly and encourages people to make horrid designs that suck.
I can't middle-click to open flash links in new tab. I can't hover over them to see their destination. Unless they for some reason redirect and force me to load another page, which wastes my time, I can't use my browser's back button to return from them; nor can I copy the URL and return to them at any time, from anywhere.
... not that it's of any significance, but isn't the website we're talking about actually Javascript, not flash? >.>
Correct. I was gonna mention that to Sy but he apparently only likes html only sites so it wouldn't change much.
None.
Wait....
It's Javascript... With a loading bar?
None.
Wait....
It's Javascript... With a loading bar?
Si. Whats so funny about a loading bar in java? I thought it was nice for the slower users lol.
None.
Nifty Javascript. Don't like how you can't right click and open in new tabs or any of that stuff.
Aesthetically pleasing, but not a very good design imo.
None.
Wait....
It's Javascript... With a loading bar?
Si. Whats so funny about a loading bar in java? I thought it was nice for the slower users lol.
Java != Javascript.
And Javascript should never need a loading bar....
None.
The fact that you need a loading bar is baaaaaaaaad, it means your page is far too large. First of all, the iphone images are saved as PNGs even though they contain gradients and other things that don't compress well. Save them as high-quality JPGs instead (92 quality jpg ended up being 1/3 of the size). Second of all (much more minor point) you don't have file transfer compression enabled on your web server (though you might not be able to change that).
None.
I just visited the site again. I find it really annoying now.
None.