STF mod creator, Modcrafters.com admin, CampaignCreations.org staff
I admitted it because I'm not going to sit there and pretend it doesn't bother me. He has no right to treat anyone like that, be it fellow user or a staff member.
Community wise, I want SEN to shift from being a social club into being a place for SC customs. Not just mapping, not just modding, not just tutorial/wiki information. I want us to do the whole nine yards and I want us to do it well. And I don't want to walk into another SC site and see posts about how the people on SEN were so unhelpful that the topic starter had to come to this place for help to fix his problem, or a friendlier place to release his map. SEN should be all about being the best place possible for SC custom content, the community of loyal members who have put in a lot of time here deserve that, and deserve to be a part of something they can be proud of. That is a major goal of mine, and I'm not sure how we go from the lukewarm state I think we're in now, to being that place, but you know what? We've got a lot of mappers and modders who I'm sure would love to tell us all the things we could do to provide them with an excellent site that suits their needs.
Moderation: Tougher moderation, no more pointless fines, super short suspensions, and letting people off the hook. If we suspend someone, we should stand by it. But I don't think 1 year suspensions like Dev's are proper. Yes he did something very bad, either give him a month out or ban him outright. A year suspension? Come on.
Anyway:
Moderation actions are used to deter rule breakers from doing so again, and unless we accomplish that, than I feel we are being too lax. Being willfully stupid and ignorant is going to be a swift way to the void. If you are not here to be a productive, contributing member than we really don't need you. We are providing a service for free and we do not owe nonproductive, noncontributing members anything. We are lucky to have the ones who are productive and contribute and we should listen to them. Those are the voices that need to be heard.
Example:
The quote chain that Merrell suspended everyone over. Now IP overturned those suspensions, or at least mine anyway I didn't look into the others, but that was a bad idea. Merrell's action was harsh enough that the people involved would think twice before spamming again as they had. I was surprised, pleasantly surprised as it so happens, and I would've gladly served my suspension because Merrell showed me that the staff wasn't dead. It wasn't totally indifferent to the state of SEN, and at least one other person had had enough of the kidiot spamfest that has been going on for awhile now. I hope he continues such actions and serves as an example to other staff members on what I'm looking for.
Not to mention Farty knows how to code, man, Farty should most certainly be admin! <3 Farty!
I agree, but will Farty be active is my concern, will he be able to concentrate on SEN and get things done. Farty is an okay dude but he has ADD and has a lot of unfinished programs and such. Then again, I have a lot of unfinished maps.
You're either in it or you aren't.
I'm in to do a job. If I feel that job is done, I'm out. If I feel that job no longer needs doing because ML is doing SEN's job so much better that anyone still here is just being petty, I'm out. But I am not putting SEN down for the count, I will never be the one in charge of that, nor would I do so if it was in my power. I am going to help SEN for as long as it wants to continue. However, I have to say the
plans for ML 2.0 are so grand that I don't think SEN is going to have anything on it advantage wise. We'll see, because things don't always go according to plan. Maybe ML 2.0 will fail horribly and I'll stay on here and continue. Anything is possible. We'll find out as it happens.
These both show promise, they are good responses.
An Admin's job is never truly done, not if you wish to accomplish what you wrote in your first post. That is what I mean by being in it or not. These changes you speak of require vigilance.
As for NerdyTerdy, intentionally antagonizing, provoking, cursing out, and flaming any member should not be tolerated. I agree. But when you establish what is not okay, doing as much yourself is not right. It shows poor judgment and tarnishes your credibility. You can be stern without stooping to their level. The contributing members you covet so expect that of their leader. I expect it. I expect it from myself as well, whether I'm an admin or not.
Now, while these posts show potential...
I have maybe two weeks before ML launches, I really don't see how much damage I can do to SEN in that time frame, nor do I see how I'd much care after I have ML to worry about.
...this just shows honest dishonesty. I don't care if you tell me ahead of time that you're going to steal from me, in the end you're still stealing from me. You have bluntly said you don't care about SEN, completely contradicting all those flowery words about aspiring to better SEN. When you wrote passionately about wanting SEN to be a place to be proud of, were you
really thinking about SEN? Or is all that fluff just a repurposing of your Maplantis goals and dreams?
You do not have SEN's best interest at heart. You've plainly confessed it. I cannot support you in light of this. Sorry.