[skip all navigation]

Zerglings' Appearance in SC2, The current changes from SC to SC2

Pages: 1 2 3 » 5 >
Creator: aphtershox
Time: Aug 22 2008, 8:59 am
Topic Locked
Topic Locked
This topic has been locked!
Reason: Topic served its purpose.
Closed by: [Doodan]:]

Post #1     aphtershox Aug 22 2008, 8:59 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Okay, so, I looked everywhere for a topic on this, and since I didn't find one (which kinda surprised me), I'm gonna make one.

I'm assuming I'm not the only one that's noticed that zerglings in Starcraft are actually kind of cute. They look cute, sound cute, and run cute. I'm sure many people would actually buy zergling plushies if they existed. My point is, I looked up zerglings for SC2 out of curiosity, and I've noticed that their design is actually pretty lame right now, as it seems to have been unnecessarily changed. They no longer have dog-like bodies and dog/raptor-like muzzles like SC lings, but rather have flatter faces and big tusks sticking out from the sides, with heavy-looking bodies and bug wings that totally make them look like roaches from an overhead view. I mean, I'm new, but I thought the point of the zergling was to be fairly fast. The new zerglings are not only ugly, but unnecessarily altered to look most unswift.

Okay, just so we're clear:
(user posted image)
SC Manual art

(user posted image)
SC zergling overhead view

(user posted image)
This is the original zergling as everyone sees it now...

Now for the changes:

(user posted image)
SC2 zergling overhead view

(user posted image)
SC2 winged model

This is the horror. I've found this in several places just searching Starcraft sites, to my dismay--I was hoping it was a badly done fan art or something, because surely they wouldn't have done this...

(user posted image)
This is the conceptual abomination (even for the zerg) conceived by the Blizzard artist.

Now, these are just ugly. They've gone and destroyed the zergling that everyone knows and loves. That chaps my hide, it really does. Samwise Didier, the art director and concept artist, was commenting on the latter pic on Blizzcast. And I quote:
Quote
Well, we took the basic shape and style, and the elements of the zergling that everyone liked, the little small hoppy guys, mouth full of teeth and claws and all that and, when doing the concept, it’s like, "Okay, yeah, this is cool, we got a zergling. It’s a little bit tweaked different than the original one"...
BS. They don't look anything like the original one. I wouldn't have even assumed this was a zergling if I just saw the picture. It's not "a little bit tweaked," it's "totally and completely overhauled," and for the worst at that.

And I quote Mr. Didier again:
Quote
But that was basically the idea. Was to take, you know, sort of a cool character from StarCraft and then give it the next level up. Like, not changing what it is. Like everyone who looks at this won’t say, “What the hell’s that?” you know. It’s a zergling. You know what it is. "It’s a zergling, Lester, a different kind of zerg."
BS. Totally changing what it is. Everyone who looks at this, outside of the context of SC2, or perhaps even in it, will say "What the hell's that?" because it doesn't look like a zergling at all. In case anyone else can't believe this was actually said, here's the source: http://www.blizzard.com/blizzcast/archive/episode1.xml

I just think it would be a shame to let them make the zerglings super-amazingly hideous for no reason. Sure, give them wings, but the whole look doesn't need to be overhauled. And bug wings just make me want to smack it with a fly swatter about 26 times to be perfectly honest. I just figured since no one's brought attention to this that I should, before they release it like this. Doesn't this bother anyone else?

Finally, roaches (not to be confused with the new Roach unit) "emerging" from a sewer grating:
http://gomeler.com/pic/Articles/Starcraft%202/Zergling%20Rush%20Small.jpg (img tag not working here.)

Top

Post #2     chuiu Aug 22 2008, 1:13 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
Samwise threatened us not to talk about it under the penalty of this:

(user posted image)

Top

Post #3     MadZombie! Aug 22 2008, 2:24 pm

[Avatar]
mfw
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
why wasn't the first pic of this topic used as the model?... sam wise is a doosh D:

(user posted image)
Top

Post #4     StrikerX22 Aug 22 2008, 7:43 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Quote from chuiu
Samwise threatened us not to talk about it under the penalty of this:

I forget where he said that... but wasn't he referencing complaining about them having wings? In any case, I found this:

Quote
How did you handle the Dark Templar design and the critique?
- It was a lot of people's favorite character, so it's hard to please everybody. Some people loved the new design, some hated it. It's the same as the wings on the Zerglings, some loved it some did not. Now it's removed. We will make the game so we think it's cool. It's a gut feeling.
source: http://www.gosugamers.net/starcraft/news/8104-a-q-a-with-samwise-didier


Also please note Samwise's early concept art of the original zergling:
(user posted image)

This is quite similarly sucky. He obviously was hoping they'd go back to his roots with the bulky, over-ugly design that looks like something from warcraft fanart. I really wish they wouldn't use warcraft artists for SC > >...

In any case, yes, I completely agree with the issue at hand. I hate the new zergling. I believe you forgot to add this pic to the discussion:

(user posted image) edit: flipping image won't display sometimes, so link: http://images.wikia.com/starcraft/images/a/ac/Zergling_SC2_HeadAnim1.gif

That's the new profile pic. That's what I hate seeing. The face isn't anywhere near the same, nor does it "act" it. Zerglings were lovable. They are basically the cutest unit in starcraft that is simultaneously one of the most scary. It makes the players love them more, not less. And there should totally be zergling plushies... there's gotta be an sc plushie maker in korea somewhere =P.

Top

Post #5     [Vi3t-X]:] Aug 23 2008, 12:24 am

[Avatar]
Hello.
offlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
If Zerglings get wings, Zealots should fly.

Top

Post #6     chuiu Aug 23 2008, 2:53 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
He wasn't hoping to go back to old zergling, he liked the new one a lot. The reason they're going back to old design is because of all us complaining about it (YES THANK YOU FOR LISTENING +10 points to blizzard). I can tell he feels strongly about his new designs but also understands that changing them means alienating a lot of people who love the old designs.

They're making a right decision, imo, but there are also aspects of the new DT and Zergling that look pretty awesome. For example the feet of the new zergling (getting rid of webbed feet) looks good, matter of fact all they have to do to the current model is remove its wings and shorten it a tiny bit. The DT's armor looks really cool, all they need to do is bring him back to his old weapon.

Top

Post #7     aphtershox Aug 23 2008, 4:08 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
I wouldn't mind if they changed the zerglings a little maybe, but the fact of the current design is that it's completely redone, and looks like an entirely different unit, and might as well be. Heck, they could make it another unit, I wouldn't care. It's just not a ling's all.

Top

Post #8     StrikerX22 Aug 23 2008, 4:17 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Quote from chuiu
He wasn't hoping to go back to old zergling, he liked the new one a lot. The reason they're going back to old design is because of all us complaining about it (YES THANK YOU FOR LISTENING +10 points to blizzard). I can tell he feels strongly about his new designs but also understands that changing them means alienating a lot of people who love the old designs.
You misunderstand. I meant that the new concept art looks like the original concept art (black and white pic) which came before the zergling we know and love. I'm certainly grateful that they have taken the wings out, but what company wouldn't after so many people complained about it? Furthermore they had no features implemented to make use of the wings, afaik, though some stuff was considered.

It's sad people didn't complain about the physical features though, because I have the feeling many haven't really noticed the changes beyond the wings much. I get the feeling not many people noticed the profile pic, for one.

Quote from chuiu
They're making a right decision, imo, but there are also aspects of the new DT and Zergling that look pretty awesome. For example the feet of the new zergling (getting rid of webbed feet) looks good, matter of fact all they have to do to the current model is remove its wings and shorten it a tiny bit. The DT's armor looks really cool, all they need to do is bring him back to his old weapon.

This isn't about the DT (though the context of the quote was), but I'd say it looks very unlike them... I need to brush up on my broodwar game-lore, but I would think the DT people probably didn't fight so much that things like armor and crazy weapons were necessary, so I can see them changing I suppose a good bit. Weapon's pretty weird, kinda cool, though kinda too warcraft-looking IMO, ie, fantasy-esque.

As for the lings, I don't mind seeing them get minor changes. The new hydralisk is fairly normal, but has a billion spikes... I think this should be toned down, but it doesn't look too horrible. Zerglings on the other hand are light, fast, agile creatures. Wth is this new thing they call a zergling? not only is it far too bulky, but it doesn't even have a face close to the old one. Change its feet, I don't care. Give it more spikes like they seem to like to do now. Whatever. But frickin' keep its identity. Its face is that, and its general shape is that.

One thing that bothers me a bit is the idea of units mutating since the broodwar era but not gaining any stat/ability changes. Wings? weird, but maybe, if there's an effect. I'd hate to see their current (but wingless) physical change being validated by a stat/ability change admittedly, but if they keep it, they'd better at least have something.

Top

Post #9     chuiu Aug 23 2008, 4:42 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
The spikes definitely need to be toned down on the hydra, its one thing to upgrade the appearance of something to make it look better but all the extra spikes is just overkill and makes it harder to differentiate units from each other.

Top

Post #10     KrayZee Aug 23 2008, 6:35 am

[Avatar]
Yay
onlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
StrikerX22, that is an outdated StarCraft II Zergling portrait.

I asked my brother "What is it like coming out from the same vagina as me?" and had an awesome response.

File: Portal Concept
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCC19Kxvq2Y
Top

Post #11     JaFF Aug 23 2008, 5:21 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Elite
Quote from KrayZee
StrikerX22, that is an outdated StarCraft II Zergling portrait.
Then link us to an updated one please.

Top

Post #12     KrayZee Aug 23 2008, 6:02 pm

[Avatar]
Yay
onlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
Quote from JaFF
Quote from KrayZee
StrikerX22, that is an outdated StarCraft II Zergling portrait.
Then link us to an updated one please.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_8_zxOX32E

Find it.

I asked my brother "What is it like coming out from the same vagina as me?" and had an awesome response.

File: Portal Concept
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCC19Kxvq2Y
Top

Post #13     aphtershox Aug 23 2008, 9:10 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Were we supposed to actually be able to find it in a youtube vid?

Top

Post #14     Symmetry Aug 23 2008, 9:14 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
Took me 20 seconds to find. Skip to 2:50.

(user posted image)
Top

Post #15     KrayZee Aug 23 2008, 9:16 pm

[Avatar]
Yay
onlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
Quote from aphtershox
Were we supposed to actually be able to find it in a youtube vid?
It is rare to find a Zergling Portrait through a fucking screenshot... :-_-:

In fact, I never found any.

I asked my brother "What is it like coming out from the same vagina as me?" and had an awesome response.

File: Portal Concept
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCC19Kxvq2Y
Top

Post #16     aphtershox Aug 23 2008, 11:02 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Well, I see SOMEthing at 2:50 and after at about 2:55 that vaguely resembles the portrait that StrikerX22 posted. But heck, it's like bad quality anyway in a vid....what was the point again?

Top

Post #17     Rawk_Flare Aug 23 2008, 11:27 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Not that you mention it, the wings do look ugly...

Top

Post #18     StrikerX22 Aug 24 2008, 12:21 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
That's sad. The "updated" pic looks very similar to the one I posted, as much as it could with youtube's quality. It looks like it's at a different angle and darker is all. It's too hard to say from that. soooo I don't really see the point to pointing out my outdated pic, unless you can find something we can actually see. I mean really.

and please, call me striker--you don't have to say someone's whole name to communicate =P.

Top

Post #19     KrayZee Aug 24 2008, 5:12 am

[Avatar]
Yay
onlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
That picture is clearly updated, the three portraits you see in the StarCraft II website stood there since the announcement of StarCraft II. Only the Zealot's portrait seen in the StarCraft II website can be seen on the most recent build.

I asked my brother "What is it like coming out from the same vagina as me?" and had an awesome response.

File: Portal Concept
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCC19Kxvq2Y
Top

Post #20     StrikerX22 Aug 25 2008, 8:01 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Quote from KrayZee
That picture is clearly updated, the three portraits you see in the StarCraft II website stood there since the announcement of StarCraft II. Only the Zealot's portrait seen in the StarCraft II website can be seen on the most recent build.

In my defense, I NEVER look at the intro area of that site anymore. I did it once, and I prolly didn't even know that was supposed to be a flippin ling =P. But for sure, That was a long time ago, and I would've forgotten it. and yes the "picture" is updated, but from what we can see, we don't know if the model is different. Once again, if you can find a better pic, I'd be grateful of course. I'll keep an eye out.

Top
Topic Locked
Topic Locked
This topic has been locked!
Reason: Topic served its purpose.
Closed by: [Doodan]:]
0 members in this topic (italic members are currently writing a reply): None
+ guest(s)


[02:43 am]
Sacrieur -- bahahaha
[02:40 am]
Sacrieur -- Right, puzzles are half the fun.
[02:39 am]
Sacrieur -- He may not just be in the rp-mindset very well. He doesn't think from his character's point of view, he's thinking from his point of view.
[02:39 am]
Fire_Kame -- it just. I thought. *sigh* I'm almost stealing the Martin plot, you know. I don't want to say too much. But I thought hey to someone interested in the things this would be an interesting apprentice type of person. Yes. Trying to be vague, mind.
[02:37 am]
Sacrieur -- Maybe that's your problem, you're thinking.
[02:36 am]
Fire_Kame -- ugh. I just thought Martin would be fun. :\
[02:36 am]
Sacrieur -- And by in his posts I mean the fact he edits them several times and double posts to add more information he forgot.
Please log in to shout.