Toggling spawns would be really really unbalanced... You get all the positive effects of capturing the base but negative effects of it, which ultimately makes it a primary objective to capture bases for enhanced teleportation, which takes away from the focus of sieging the enemies temple in the first place... I think that it should just spawn fewer additional units, this way it gives a positive effect for capturing whilst also maintaining a negative effect of feeding, just not as severe...

Toggling spawns would be really really unbalanced...
You get all the positive effects of capturing the base but negative effects of it, which ultimately makes it a primary objective to capture bases for enhanced teleportation, which takes away from the focus of sieging the enemies temple in the first place...
I think that it should just spawn fewer additional units, this way it gives a positive effect for capturing whilst also maintaining a negative effect of feeding, just not as severe...

My strategies call upon Sun Tzu, you may think I am weak, but a revaltion takes place inside. The power of a hidden mana count.

My strategies call upon Sun Tzu, you may think I am weak, but a revaltion takes place inside. The power of a hidden mana count.

[quote=name:Shocko]Toggling spawns would be really really unbalanced... You get all the positive effects of capturing the base but negative effects of it, which ultimately makes it a primary objective to capture bases for enhanced teleportation, which takes away from the focus of sieging the enemies temple in the first place... [b]I think that it should just spawn fewer additional units, this way it gives a positive effect for capturing whilst also maintaining a negative effect of feeding, just not as severe...[/b][/quote] I was reading through your post just go "wrong wrong wrong wrong..." until I read the bold, I just have to agree with you. It's so simple. I would definitely capture bases if they only spawned 1-2 units. I think we're also forgetting that more bases means more defensible geysers. On that, I believe that each bases geysers should be place in better positions where an offending unit would be subject to cannon fire.

Quote from Shocko

Toggling spawns would be really really unbalanced...
You get all the positive effects of capturing the base but negative effects of it, which ultimately makes it a primary objective to capture bases for enhanced teleportation, which takes away from the focus of sieging the enemies temple in the first place...
I think that it should just spawn fewer additional units, this way it gives a positive effect for capturing whilst also maintaining a negative effect of feeding, just not as severe...

I was reading through your post just go "wrong wrong wrong wrong..." until I read the bold, I just have to agree with you. It's so simple. I would definitely capture bases if they only spawned 1-2 units.

I think we're also forgetting that more bases means more defensible geysers. On that, I believe that each bases geysers should be place in better positions where an offending unit would be subject to cannon fire.

Cannons are way too weak to provide defense for a geysur really. The cannons are good against some classes early game, but at that point, rushing assims isn't necessarily going to pay itself off (most likely it wont)

Cannons are way too weak to provide defense for a geysur really. The cannons are good against some classes early game, but at that point, rushing assims isn't necessarily going to pay itself off (most likely it wont)

[quote=name:ClansAreForGays]I think we're also forgetting that more bases means more defensible geysers. On that, I believe that each bases geysers should be place in better positions where an offending unit would be subject to cannon fire.[/quote] This is part of what I was talking about when I said bases should be more defensible. :P

Quote from ClansAreForGays

I think we're also forgetting that more bases means more defensible geysers. On that, I believe that each bases geysers should be place in better positions where an offending unit would be subject to cannon fire.

This is part of what I was talking about when I said bases should be more defensible.

Maybe the toss buildings shouldn't make different level spawns but instead transform into other defenses (sunks, diff bunker combo's, and maybe very strong stationary units)?

Maybe the toss buildings shouldn't make different level spawns but instead transform into other defenses (sunks, diff bunker combo's, and maybe very strong stationary units)?

SCV can already make bunkers o.o It's just kinda expensive and not that efficient o.o

SCV can already make bunkers o.o
It's just kinda expensive and not that efficient o.o

[quote=name:MadZombie]Maybe the toss buildings shouldn't make different level spawns but instead transform into other defenses (sunks, diff bunker combo's, and maybe very strong stationary units)?[/quote] And there goes a spell each from the Archer and Special Ops...

Quote from MadZombie

Maybe the toss buildings shouldn't make different level spawns but instead transform into other defenses (sunks, diff bunker combo's, and maybe very strong stationary units)?

And there goes a spell each from the Archer and Special Ops...

JUST RELEASE A BETA OR SOMETHING ALREADY!

JUST RELEASE A BETA OR SOMETHING ALREADY!

I've played as Assasin under P4 and P5 (I am not sure about the other players) but you are able to use the Level 2 Spell without even upgrading... Also, I think this is something to do with the version and the P2 Rine, but I couldn't cripple him with Assasin, was indeed upsetting.

I've played as Assasin under P4 and P5 (I am not sure about the other players) but you are able to use the Level 2 Spell without even upgrading...
Also, I think this is something to do with the version and the P2 Rine, but I couldn't cripple him with Assasin, was indeed upsetting.

Nice finds for the first 2, but the third has already been found and solved.

Nice finds for the first 2, but the third has already been found and solved.

Ummm..... is Assault's grenade supposed to paralyze his allies too? If yes, change that. If no, Player Two's does. :P

Ummm..... is Assault's grenade supposed to paralyze his allies too? If yes, change that. If no, Player Two's does.

And thanks to me, Moosie got GFG'ed >:D

And thanks to me, Moosie got GFG'ed >:D