[skip all navigation]

0 / 0, what do you get?

Creator: HCM™stickynote
Time: Jun 30 2008, 11:18 pm

Post #1     HCM™stickynote Jun 30 2008, 11:18 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
Out of curiosity, if you took 0, and divided it by 0, what would you get? A number divided by itself gives you 1, a number divided by 0 is undefined, but 0 divided by a number gives you 0. So which one is it? Or is it neither of them?

Top

Post #2     cheeze Jun 30 2008, 11:35 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
It's undefined. Even using limits, it's undefined. Note that a non-zero devided by zero is infinity (using limits).

Top

Post #3     [Riney]:] Jun 30 2008, 11:42 pm

[Avatar]
NO
offlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
If 0 is null, then there is exactly 1 null part in zero.

Thats how I see it

For those with too much time on their hands: [Le Click]
Top

Post #4     HailFire Jun 30 2008, 11:42 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
How many times can you put nothing into nothing?

"Once" seems like the logical answer.

Top

Post #5     Ckol Jun 30 2008, 11:56 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Quote from stickynote
Out of curiosity, if you took 0, and divided it by 0, what would you get? A number divided by itself gives you 1, a number divided by 0 is undefined, but 0 divided by a number gives you 0. So which one is it? Or is it neither of them?

Division by zero is not possible, just thinking about. If i have nothing and divide it into nothing groups, what do i get? That statement is meaningless. I really dont feel like getting into the math, but in our ordinary number system (you can get funky and create a system where you can divide by zero), division by zero is meaningless and thus undefined.

Quote from cheeze
It's undefined. Even using limits, it's undefined. Note that a non-zero devided by zero is infinity (using limits).

Even with limits, 0/0 is an indeterminate form, there is simply not enough information to define the value, hence, it is also undefined

Quote from s(Dark_Marine)9
If 0 is null, then there is exactly 1 null part in zero.

Thats how I see it

Zero and Null are two similar but different concepts.

Top

Post #6     Clokr_ Jul 1 2008, 12:08 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
Quote from cheeze
It's undefined. Even using limits, it's undefined. Note that a non-zero devided by zero is infinity (using limits).

That's not actually true, only when the denominator 0 refers to an infinitesimal and not 0 itself.

lim x->0 3/x = inf
lim x->0 3/0 doesn't exist :P

Top

Post #7     Test Jul 1 2008, 12:11 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Quote from cheeze
It's undefined. Even using limits, it's undefined. Note that a non-zero devided by zero is infinity (using limits).
You solve for it by solving it as x approaches 0 from the left, and from the right. If the two answers are equal, then you can say that the limit where x=0 is the answer. I taught myself calculus in high school.

y = lim (x->0) (1 / x)
1 / -0.0001 = -10000

1 / 0.0001 = 10000

-10000 ≠ 10000

y = 1 / x
(-infinity, 0) & (0, infinity)

Will be back on Starcraft in August. Currently on a working holiday visa in Australia as a bartender.
Top

Post #8     cheeze Jul 1 2008, 12:19 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
Quote from Clokr_
Quote from cheeze
It's undefined. Even using limits, it's undefined. Note that a non-zero devided by zero is infinity (using limits).

That's not actually true, only when the denominator 0 refers to an infinitesimal and not 0 itself.

lim x->0 3/x = inf
lim x->0 3/0 doesn't exist :P
Yeah, the second part isn't REALLY using the limit. :P

Top

Post #9     candle12345! Jul 1 2008, 12:32 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Ahh but any number ^0 = 1.
And if you look at it logically, that means there are two trains of thought defending 0/0=1
Therefore, it is for most intents and purposes, 1.

Top

Post #10     Symmetry Jul 1 2008, 12:37 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
Quote from candle12345
Ahh but any number ^0 = 1.
And if you look at it logically, that means there are two trains of thought defending 0/0=1
Therefore, it is for most intents and purposes, 1.

No.

(user posted image)
Top

Post #11     Clokr_ Jul 1 2008, 12:38 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
4/2 = 2 because 2*2 = 4
14/7 = 2 because 2*7 = 14
60/5 = 12 because 12*5 = 60

0/5 = 0 because 0*5 = 0
5/0 = not defined because no number times 0 = 5
0/0 = not defined because any number times 0 = 0

Top

Post #12     RIVE Jul 1 2008, 12:53 am

[Avatar]
ˆ_ˆ
offlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
My Trigonometry teacher once said there was a way to divide zero by itself.

I would guess it requires an equation using imaginary numbers. There's no way reals could be involved.

"Cool story, brah.
It's a shame I really don't agree with a single argument you made."

-mikachu93
Top

Post #13     Lord Agamemnon Jul 1 2008, 12:53 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
It depends on what you're doing with it. For instance, in the equation (X^2/X), at X=0 the value is 0 if you take the limit. In sin(x)/x, however, the limit is 1. 0/0 by itself is undefined; it depends on what function and context it's being used in.

Imaginary numbers aren't involved. Just calculus :P

Top

Post #14     Clokr_ Jul 1 2008, 12:56 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
Quote from RIVE
My Trigonometry teacher once said there was a way to divide zero by itself.

I would guess it requires an equation using imaginary numbers. There's no way reals could be involved.

True zeros can never be divided. He was probably talking about limits, where what you divide are two expressions which fastly approach zero. And that can result in any value (inf, -inf, a number or undefined).

Top

Post #15     Zell. Jul 1 2008, 1:00 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
0 represents nothing. Simply therefore you cannot divide something by 0 because you aren't dividing by anything. 0 -diviby- 0 = 0. So if you don't get it... You have nothing, you divide by nothing <-thats important. So your dividing by nothing (same thing as not dividing) leaving you with the original value unaffected. Nothing, which is 0.

Top

Post #16     HCM™stickynote Jul 1 2008, 2:03 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
So that means 0/0 equals 0?

Quote from RIVE
My Trigonometry teacher once said there was a way to divide zero by itself.

I would guess it requires an equation using imaginary numbers. There's no way reals could be involved.
Just something to note, is that the imaginary number is the square root of -1.

Top

Post #17     O)Matt Burch Jul 1 2008, 2:08 am

[Avatar]
bannedcontact
Rank: Regular
stickynote, 0/0 is undefined.

Top

Post #18     candle12345! Jul 1 2008, 3:32 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Quote from stickynote
So that means 0/0 equals 0?
Quote from RIVE
My Trigonometry teacher once said there was a way to divide zero by itself. I would guess it requires an equation using imaginary numbers. There's no way reals could be involved.
Just something to note, is that the imaginary number is the square root of -1.
And the square root of -1 isn't imaginary, it's a not real number.

Top

Post #19     cheeze Jul 1 2008, 3:43 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
What do you think imaginary means?

Top

Post #20     Ckol Jul 1 2008, 4:26 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Quote from candle12345
Quote from stickynote
So that means 0/0 equals 0?
Quote from RIVE
My Trigonometry teacher once said there was a way to divide zero by itself. I would guess it requires an equation using imaginary numbers. There's no way reals could be involved.
Just something to note, is that the imaginary number is the square root of -1.
And the square root of -1 isn't imaginary, it's a not real number.

SQRT(-1) or i is called the imaginary unit, a complex number is basically a real number plus a multiple of i.

Division by zero is undefined in the complex number system as well as our real number system.

Top
0 members in this topic (italic members are currently writing a reply): None
+ guest(s)


[03:26 pm]
Roy -- Yeah, but we do our best to serve the community. :awesome:
[01:09 pm]
TF- -- mods just can't catch a break
[01:00 pm]
Wing Zero -- Rai I never said I wanted it to be a small map. It should be bigger then rift.
[12:41 pm]
Roy -- I think Kaias' goal is to have save files generated that you could use natively in SC, not to use a modded game to load data.
[11:43 am]
TF- -- banks in sc1 y'all
[10:35 am]
NudeRaider -- teamfight gangbang ftw. Would do it all night.
[05:19 am]
Raitaki -- Teamfight gangbang 24/7? :\
Please log in to shout.