[quote=name:bajadulce][quote=name:Test] I've seen some rumors that it's being released this weekend, but I doubt that's correct.[/quote] Wow! I think that would be just so cool! Ya! Screw marketing. Screw hype. It's just money! Come on Blizzard.. we know SC2 and D3 are already FINISHED...[/quote] BTW that was posted as sarcasm and yet the sillyness continues. [quote=name:chuiu][quote=name:Morphling]It looks like D3 is much farther along than SC2.[/quote]How the fuck can you say this based off a 20 minute gameplay video and several 20 second demonstrations? They've shown you two classes and eight skills between them and you say the game is further along? WTF?[/quote]lol. But chui, that's all there is to the new Diablo III. The way I see it, Blizzard knows that ppl will buy this final game no matter the stage of completeness. They're gonna make zillions the first day of it's release (which btw is next weekend) before the reviewers can write up how incomplete the game is. This is just money making genius.

Quote from bajadulce

Quote from Test

I've seen some rumors that it's being released this weekend, but I doubt that's correct.

Wow! I think that would be just so cool! Ya! Screw marketing. Screw hype. It's just money! Come on Blizzard.. we know SC2 and D3 are already FINISHED...

BTW that was posted as sarcasm and yet the sillyness continues.

Quote from chuiu

Quote from Morphling

It looks like D3 is much farther along than SC2.

How the fuck can you say this based off a 20 minute gameplay video and several 20 second demonstrations? They've shown you two classes and eight skills between them and you say the game is further along? WTF?

lol. But chui, that's all there is to the new Diablo III. The way I see it, Blizzard knows that ppl will buy this final game no matter the stage of completeness. They're gonna make zillions the first day of it's release (which btw is next weekend) before the reviewers can write up how incomplete the game is. This is just money making genius.

[quote=name:Hug A Zergling]Remember when all the SC'ers hated the WC'ers and Diablos? (And vice versa) I miss that Deathman. I really miss that.[/quote] All I remember is SC'ers hating WC'ers, hell, most of SEN actually plays or did play D2. And baja, source of info pl0x.

Quote from Hug A Zergling

Remember when all the SC'ers hated the WC'ers and Diablos? (And vice versa) I miss that Deathman. I really miss that.

All I remember is SC'ers hating WC'ers, hell, most of SEN actually plays or did play D2.

And baja, source of info pl0x.

[quote=name:chuiu][quote=name:Morphling]It looks like D3 is much farther along than SC2.[/quote] I'm fucking sick of sheep saying this already. How the fuck can you say this based off a 20 minute gameplay video and several 20 second demonstrations? They've shown you two classes and eight skills between them and you say the game is further along? WTF?[/quote] DIII looks waaaaay better than SCII right now. Even if it's not completed or so. I'd definately try to buy this when it arrives to El Salvador.

Quote from chuiu

Quote from Morphling

It looks like D3 is much farther along than SC2.

I'm fucking sick of sheep saying this already. How the fuck can you say this based off a 20 minute gameplay video and several 20 second demonstrations? They've shown you two classes and eight skills between them and you say the game is further along? WTF?

DIII looks waaaaay better than SCII right now. Even if it's not completed or so.
I'd definately try to buy this when it arrives to El Salvador.

[quote=name:Corbo][quote=name:chuiu][quote=name:Morphling]It looks like D3 is much farther along than SC2.[/quote] I'm fucking sick of sheep saying this already. How the fuck can you say this based off a 20 minute gameplay video and several 20 second demonstrations? They've shown you two classes and eight skills between them and you say the game is further along? WTF?[/quote] DIII looks waaaaay better than SCII right now. Even if it's not completed or so. I'd definately try to buy this when it arrives to El Salvador.[/quote] Agreed....can you imagine doing a raid of a dungeon in D3? That would be fucking epic. BTW: Isn't that where Hobos lives?

Quote from Corbo[MM]

Quote from chuiu

Quote from Morphling

It looks like D3 is much farther along than SC2.

I'm fucking sick of sheep saying this already. How the fuck can you say this based off a 20 minute gameplay video and several 20 second demonstrations? They've shown you two classes and eight skills between them and you say the game is further along? WTF?

DIII looks waaaaay better than SCII right now. Even if it's not completed or so.
I'd definately try to buy this when it arrives to El Salvador.

Agreed....can you imagine doing a raid of a dungeon in D3? That would be fucking epic.

BTW: Isn't that where Hobos lives?

Basically I got 2 games on my "2-buy" list, Sc2, And D3 :D, Loved all the previous versions of both games.

Basically I got 2 games on my "2-buy" list, Sc2, And D3 , Loved all the previous versions of both games.

[quote=name:Deathman101]BTW: Isn't that where Hobos lives?[/quote] Yes, but don't tell anyone about it.

Quote from Deathman101

BTW: Isn't that where Hobos lives?

Yes, but don't tell anyone about it.

I'd rather not break my mouse this time. Count me out.

I'd rather not break my mouse this time. Count me out.

[quote=name:Corbo][quote=name:Deathman101]BTW: Isn't that where Hobos lives?[/quote] Yes, but don't tell anyone about it.[/quote] [color=#CD0000]>=/ Difference = Corbo can get money much easier than me.[/color]

Quote from Corbo[MM]

Quote from Deathman101

BTW: Isn't that where Hobos lives?

Yes, but don't tell anyone about it.

>=/

Difference = Corbo can get money much easier than me.

This is so cool. I'm definetely getting this, even though I haven't played either of the diablo's.

This is so cool. I'm definetely getting this, even though I haven't played either of the diablo's.

how the hell can i view the trailer? I try putting my birthday in, but the year only goes down to 2000 or 2001. :<_<:

how the hell can i view the trailer? I try putting my birthday in, but the year only goes down to 2000 or 2001.

there is a scrollbar next to the numbers... it's not that easy to see :D

there is a scrollbar next to the numbers... it's not that easy to see

I like how they have the same sound effects as D2 like the scroll dropping sound, blocking sound, and arrow sound.

I like how they have the same sound effects as D2 like the scroll dropping sound, blocking sound, and arrow sound.

It will never beat the first Diablo.

It will never beat the first Diablo.

[quote=name:razorsnail]It will never beat the first Diablo.[/quote] Really? I always liked D2 more than Diablo1.

Quote from razorsnail

It will never beat the first Diablo.

Really? I always liked D2 more than Diablo1.

D2 can be more fun to play than D1, but D1's world is more haunting and immersive and maddening. Playing Diablo1 actually feels like visiting Adria the Witch for ancient tomes, or talking to Cain in the town square or running from Archbishops in the depths of Hell. The Tristram music is probably one of the best pieces of music ever composed for acoustic guitar. And who can ever forget the first time they met the butcher... [size=14][color=#CE091D][b]AHHH... FRESH MEAT![/b][/color][/size] ... so deliciously freakish. Spending too much time in those dungeons makes you feel the taint seeping in through your skin.

D2 can be more fun to play than D1, but D1's world is more haunting and immersive and maddening. Playing Diablo1 actually feels like visiting Adria the Witch for ancient tomes, or talking to Cain in the town square or running from Archbishops in the depths of Hell. The Tristram music is probably one of the best pieces of music ever composed for acoustic guitar. And who can ever forget the first time they met the butcher... AHHH... FRESH MEAT! ... so deliciously freakish. Spending too much time in those dungeons makes you feel the taint seeping in through your skin.

Amen. D1 was freeky as hell. that tristram tune was epic just gives you chills. D2 was hardly scary but i hope D3 is but i bet they'd build it more aimed for multiplayer. people just hack singleplayer anyway.

Amen. D1 was freeky as hell. that tristram tune was epic just gives you chills. D2 was hardly scary but i hope D3 is but i bet they'd build it more aimed for multiplayer. people just hack singleplayer anyway.

Well all I know is, I'm buying this once it comes out. Also gonna get SC2 / Wotlk as well =/ pretty much buying all games being released by blizzard sigh so much money being made. I agree with some of ya that DIII looks better then SC2 right now. But we need to wait and see the final product once its released what it'll be like. Anyway till then I guess just gonna run around pvping on WoW.

Well all I know is, I'm buying this once it comes out. Also gonna get SC2 / Wotlk as well =/ pretty much buying all games being released by blizzard sigh so much money being made.

I agree with some of ya that DIII looks better then SC2 right now. But we need to wait and see the final product once its released what it'll be like. Anyway till then I guess just gonna run around pvping on WoW.

The people that are saying SCII looking similar to WC3 or the thing isn't looking better than D3, seriously didn't take a close look.

The people that are saying SCII looking similar to WC3 or the thing isn't looking better than D3, seriously didn't take a close look.

[quote=name:razorsnail]D2 can be more fun to play than D1, but D1's world is more haunting and immersive and maddening. Playing Diablo1 actually feels like visiting Adria the Witch for ancient tomes, or talking to Cain in the town square or running from Archbishops in the depths of Hell. The Tristram music is probably one of the best pieces of music ever composed for acoustic guitar. And who can ever forget the first time they met the butcher... [size=14][color=#CE091D][b]AHHH... FRESH MEAT![/b][/color][/size] ... so deliciously freakish. Spending too much time in those dungeons makes you feel the taint seeping in through your skin.[/quote] Wow, I thoroughly agree here. I recall playing D1 as a young boy, and just stepping into the cathedral and having fallen and zombies run at me, scared me to death. I seriously doubt I'll feel much emotion if ever I play this game. Only the nostalgia of DII's repetitive clicking and boredom. I'm not going to get this game, I'll play it at a friends house once and decide I was right about it. And ugh I agree with most of you, the WoW phase has been long drawn out milked boring and terribly obnoxious. I'm just hoping SCII won't be another WCIII.

Quote from razorsnail

D2 can be more fun to play than D1, but D1's world is more haunting and immersive and maddening. Playing Diablo1 actually feels like visiting Adria the Witch for ancient tomes, or talking to Cain in the town square or running from Archbishops in the depths of Hell. The Tristram music is probably one of the best pieces of music ever composed for acoustic guitar. And who can ever forget the first time they met the butcher... AHHH... FRESH MEAT! ... so deliciously freakish. Spending too much time in those dungeons makes you feel the taint seeping in through your skin.

Wow, I thoroughly agree here. I recall playing D1 as a young boy, and just stepping into the cathedral and having fallen and zombies run at me, scared me to death.

I seriously doubt I'll feel much emotion if ever I play this game. Only the nostalgia of DII's repetitive clicking and boredom. I'm not going to get this game, I'll play it at a friends house once and decide I was right about it.

And ugh I agree with most of you, the WoW phase has been long drawn out milked boring and terribly obnoxious.

I'm just hoping SCII won't be another WCIII.

[quote=name:Deathman101]I'm surprised no one has said "I Told You So" yet. Anyway, this looks fucking AWESOME. Barb has always been my main and I'm more than happy with him now. Did anyone else notice that there were no giant purple monsters? This is a big step for Blizzard...[/quote] Okay so I decided to read the whole topic for once and as soon as I noticed the "Did anyone else notice there were no giant purple monsters?" I knew I would have to quote it. They have about 4 monsters currently released, and did you notice that the Witch Doctor used purple? It is highly likely there will be atleast 1 Purple monster, and that's not bad, because monsters arn't real and they should have a look that fits them, if purple is a colour that would really emphasize a monster, then purple it must be. [quote=name:IskatuMesk]Diablo 3 is currently in pre-alpha. There's no way they're going to release a game as incomplete and horrible looking as it is right now. It wouldn't even compare to that crappy diablo clone Titan Quest as it is.[/quote] I do not believe they will be releasing it anytime soon, but quite to the contrary I think that they have most of the Diablo III functionality down. You can select spells, cast spells, pick up items, equip items, there are item drops, you can move, the monsters can die, cast spells, move, fall off sides, interact with the surroundings and what not... much of what is left is making graphics for the monsters and customizing each monster, but most of the core functionalities will be inherited, so though it seems not too far, you could very well be wrong. [quote=name:Axii]Yes, All this WoW Hype has gotten old lol.[/quote] If you don't play WoW and don't visit WoW sites, then you hear no hype. I have in all this time of it being out only heard 1 group of people outside of the internet talking about it. Maybe you need to lay off the internet or something? [quote=name:Morphling]It looks like D3 is much farther along than SC2.[/quote] As I mentioned up there I somewhat agree, though I could be wrong, SCII has a lot less functions you could inhert from a root class and thus needs a lot more customization. [quote=name:chuiu][quote=name:Morphling]It looks like D3 is much farther along than SC2.[/quote] I'm fucking sick of sheep saying this already. How the fuck can you say this based off a 20 minute gameplay video and several 20 second demonstrations? They've shown you two classes and eight skills between them and you say the game is further along? WTF?[/quote] As I've once again already mentioned, core functions can be inherited, customization is what will be painful, adding monsters should be a lot easier then making what they've already got, and they probably already have a lot more done, just not showing it yet, remember, SCII has had a lot more time to show off what they've done, DIII can probably release a whole bunch of enemies, boss information, storlines, etc... in no time. [quote=name:Revelade]I'd rather not break my mouse this time. Count me out.[/quote] Get good at clicking? [quote=name:stickynote]This is so cool. I'm definetely getting this, even though I haven't played either of the diablo's.[/quote] I recommend you play the other ones, but play D1 before D2 otherwise you may no longer like D1. [quote=name:Deathman101][quote=name:razorsnail]It will never beat the first Diablo.[/quote] Really? I always liked D2 more than Diablo1.[/quote] Both are very different, D1 was more going through dungeons with parties and killing monsters, D2 was about getting items, getting stronger then dueling, D1 has a better atmosphere but D2 has a faster action. [quote=name:BeDazed]The people that are saying SCII looking similar to WC3 or the thing isn't looking better than D3, seriously didn't take a close look.[/quote] I agree with this but probably not the same point as you. I reckon all 3 games deserve their own look, Diablo II is based around prime evils and corruption, burning cathedrals and the whole package, Warcraft 3 is based off a fantasy world where at times it may be gloomy, but at other times you may be thriving and sunny, SC/SCII are more orientated around Space Domination, they deserve a more technological effect to them.

Quote from Deathman101

I'm surprised no one has said "I Told You So" yet.

Anyway, this looks fucking AWESOME. Barb has always been my main and I'm more than happy with him now. Did anyone else notice that there were no giant purple monsters? This is a big step for Blizzard...

Okay so I decided to read the whole topic for once and as soon as I noticed the "Did anyone else notice there were no giant purple monsters?" I knew I would have to quote it. They have about 4 monsters currently released, and did you notice that the Witch Doctor used purple? It is highly likely there will be atleast 1 Purple monster, and that's not bad, because monsters arn't real and they should have a look that fits them, if purple is a colour that would really emphasize a monster, then purple it must be.

Quote from IskatuMesk

Diablo 3 is currently in pre-alpha. There's no way they're going to release a game as incomplete and horrible looking as it is right now. It wouldn't even compare to that crappy diablo clone Titan Quest as it is.

I do not believe they will be releasing it anytime soon, but quite to the contrary I think that they have most of the Diablo III functionality down. You can select spells, cast spells, pick up items, equip items, there are item drops, you can move, the monsters can die, cast spells, move, fall off sides, interact with the surroundings and what not... much of what is left is making graphics for the monsters and customizing each monster, but most of the core functionalities will be inherited, so though it seems not too far, you could very well be wrong.

Quote from Axii

Yes, All this WoW Hype has gotten old lol.

If you don't play WoW and don't visit WoW sites, then you hear no hype. I have in all this time of it being out only heard 1 group of people outside of the internet talking about it. Maybe you need to lay off the internet or something?

Quote from Morphling

It looks like D3 is much farther along than SC2.

As I mentioned up there I somewhat agree, though I could be wrong, SCII has a lot less functions you could inhert from a root class and thus needs a lot more customization.

Quote from chuiu

Quote from Morphling

It looks like D3 is much farther along than SC2.

I'm fucking sick of sheep saying this already. How the fuck can you say this based off a 20 minute gameplay video and several 20 second demonstrations? They've shown you two classes and eight skills between them and you say the game is further along? WTF?

As I've once again already mentioned, core functions can be inherited, customization is what will be painful, adding monsters should be a lot easier then making what they've already got, and they probably already have a lot more done, just not showing it yet, remember, SCII has had a lot more time to show off what they've done, DIII can probably release a whole bunch of enemies, boss information, storlines, etc... in no time.

Quote from Revelade

I'd rather not break my mouse this time. Count me out.

Get good at clicking?

Quote from stickynote

This is so cool. I'm definetely getting this, even though I haven't played either of the diablo's.

I recommend you play the other ones, but play D1 before D2 otherwise you may no longer like D1.

Quote from Deathman101

Quote from razorsnail

It will never beat the first Diablo.

Really? I always liked D2 more than Diablo1.

Both are very different, D1 was more going through dungeons with parties and killing monsters, D2 was about getting items, getting stronger then dueling, D1 has a better atmosphere but D2 has a faster action.

Quote from BeDazed

The people that are saying SCII looking similar to WC3 or the thing isn't looking better than D3, seriously didn't take a close look.

I agree with this but probably not the same point as you. I reckon all 3 games deserve their own look, Diablo II is based around prime evils and corruption, burning cathedrals and the whole package, Warcraft 3 is based off a fantasy world where at times it may be gloomy, but at other times you may be thriving and sunny, SC/SCII are more orientated around Space Domination, they deserve a more technological effect to them.