[skip all navigation]

Bring/Command Updating Discussion, So we stop spamming the Ladder :P

Creator: Falkoner
Time: Apr 30 2008, 11:45 pm

Post #21     Fyrinite May 2 2008, 10:20 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
Valid locations means any number between 1 and 255. Valid in terms of data going into the function, not valid as in the location exists in the map.

The command condition will cause a lot less lag than bring, because it doesn't have to narrow it down by location when it checks the condition.

Top

Post #22     Wormer May 2 2008, 10:27 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
Quote from DiscipleOfAdun
Valid locations means any number between 1 and 255. Valid in terms of data going into the function, not valid as in the location exists in the map.
Is there a way to give the function an invalid location?

Top

Post #23     Fyrinite May 2 2008, 10:31 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Member
I actually don't know. I don't make maps hardly ever. :P

The only thought I have is that none of the map editors currently would allow invalid locations, except perhaps starforge. i think the rest double check input first.

Top

Post #24     Wormer May 2 2008, 10:35 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
Quote from DiscipleOfAdun
I actually don't know. I don't make maps hardly ever. :P

The only thought I have is that none of the map editors currently would allow invalid locations, except perhaps starforge. i think the rest double check input first.
I see :) Okay... Just to clearfy, give units is not invalidating the cache, isn't it? Fine.

Ah those lazy blizzard programmers. :bleh: Mabe they've just forgotten to invalidate when creating and giving units... Ah those programmers! :D

Top

Post #25     Tuxedo-Templar May 2 2008, 2:50 pm

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
I bet at this stage we could code a better Starcraft engine from scratch ourselves. :P

For science.
Top

Post #26     Demented Shaman May 4 2008, 3:54 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Veteran
Well it's not like the blizzard programmers coded SC with the intention of allowing complex and accurate map editing :><:
This shouldn't be a surprise at all, just look at the editor that comes with Starcraft. Clearly UMS wasn't one of their top priorities.

I'm sure it's just a result of what a programmer has to do to balance between time deadlines, efficiency, cost, and maintenance. They don't have the luxury of being able to create the most robust engine or most powerful map editor. Some may call it lazy, but from a different perspective it's just getting the job done.

Top

Post #27     Wormer May 4 2008, 7:46 am

[Avatar]
offlinecontact
Rank: Regular
You're taking it too serious: :|
:) Such an editor was an advanced tool for the game of that time... Thanks blizzard, they've always supplied their games with advanced editing tools.

Top
0 members in this topic (italic members are currently writing a reply): None
+ guest(s)


[11:20 pm]
SmE(Raitaki -- And Aristo lemme kill you for siggie :kame:
[11:20 pm]
SmE(Raitaki -- Yep, but over time, not for just 2 reps tho :P
[11:15 pm]
HCM™Aristocrat -- Preferably enough minerals for a signature enabler.
[11:15 pm]
SmE(Raitaki -- FOR MAH WORK :wtfawesome:
[11:15 pm]
SmE(Raitaki -- JACK I DEMAND MINERALS
[11:15 pm]
SmE(Raitaki -- Oh yeah that reminds
[11:15 pm]
Lanthanide -- within 6 weeks at the most people will get bored and give up once the novelty has worn off
Please log in to shout.