In my own personal style, I generally don't mind people modifying my stuff as long as they provide a honorary mention on who the original designer was. I made sure to mention in my posts on the SC1 Reverse series that the original maps I got them from was the Coop-Campaign by r4z0r84. Now the maps look nothing even remotely like they do, but I still used that as a baseline and added their names for honorable mentions in my posts. I also credited the maker of the Starcraft II Reverse series for giving me inspiration for making the maps. The maps themselves, honestly weren't the most well made as I focused on more personal enjoyment and decided to share it (no joke, all 6 campaigns took me about as long as it takes me to make 2 RPG maps).
Finally, a person also emailed me when I was gone asking for permission to modify the map in a different language (which I gave). He responded even after I was absent for 4+ months and I appreciate it.
Long story short, if an author puts themselves in the credits, a person shouldn't be actively removing that original author unless they explicitly stated they wanted to be removed, regardless of whether new stuff was added.
This is my style, too. If you got inspiration from something, it's only fair to credit the source especially in the case of mapmakers who are just doing this as passion projects (as opposed to large game studios who I personally don't feel as obligated to credit for ideas). In my Impossible map, everything was created from scratch, but I still credited Cyrus who created Impossible Cyrus since playing that map is what inspired me to make mine.
@ultraviolet, i do find map edits legit tho, if original authors names are keept and more than just one string name is edited, if changing a map from 1s to 2s thats a legit edit to me, i dont know the excakt map you refer to tho, Yet the original authors name should ofcourse be keept. id actually have the openion that even created mechanic systems should be linked to the author, like the spell system on buildings for excample and such mechanics. but who made what mechanics is often not shown. But here the player base really helps cause they know old maps and what author made this and that. without editors that improve and change maps into something even better than original, than the sc map development wouldnt be this good.
You are giving
way too much benefit of the doubt here. Bumping the version forward a number doesn't mean anything, it takes all of two seconds to change that. I checked the modified versions of my map, and there are no significant changes except for the complete removal of my name. There are actually fewer triggers in the versions they stole than in my original version. On top of that, they abolished my name from every place in the map. If they wanted to simply edit the map, they could say Made by: Ultraviolet, Updated/Modified by: Dark(DvS). The only reason to remove my name from everywhere would be so they could take credit for my work.
I'm also not opposed to map edits when due credit is given, although I do believe permission should still be obtained when possible. In cases where the mapmaker left the scene a long time ago, I don't think permission matters as much since it would be difficult/impossible to obtain, but the original creator should still be credited. Ultimately that's not what this topic is about, we're talking about plain and simple map theft.
Is it possible one person not beeing alyk changing the name string on the qterras map you link too, just to put shame on alyk? or that is not possible? I mean it look like it could have taken less than 10 seconds to do. Why would a map maker long term with respect for him self do such and host the maps still using hes name, wouldnt he be stupid to do so. the only intension in that name string change is bad, but whether it comes from actually alyk or another guy, is hard to see no?
Of course it's
possible, but is it likely or feasible? Seems to me like you're playing the devil's advocate just for the sake of argument. It's obvious from the evidence Excalibur presented that Alykzandir is guilty.