Staredit Network > Forums > SC1 UMS Mapmaking Assistance > Topic: When does it make sense to increment a map's major version?
When does it make sense to increment a map's major version?
Mar 24 2019, 2:03 pm
By: sethmachine  

Mar 24 2019, 2:03 pm sethmachine Post #1



Hi,

I am going by the Semantic versioning as outlined here: https://semver.org/

In short, versions are 3 numbers: MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH

E.g. "LostKingdoms-v1.13.15.scx" would be major version 1, minor version 13, patch version 15.

Starcraft map files are only consumed by players and do not have dependencies, e.g. a custom map never depends on other custom maps, unlike actual programming APIs, etc.

So when would you increment the major version of a Starcraft map?

Patch makes a lot of sense--you fixed a bug but otherwise added no new functionality to the map.
Minor is just adding new functionality without breaking existing functionality.

So maybe Major version is used when you fundamentally change triggers or how players used to do stuff.

For example, if I changed the cost of buying a unit by X amount, would this be a major version? Or really just a "balance" version (so maybe it should be MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.BALANCE or something?). Technically changing costs is a breaking change, because it forces players to revise their strategies...

But, if I removed a spell from the game, or removed access to buildings/units/tech tree, maybe that's a MAJOR version?

But if I add a new spell/inventory system, but all other systems stay the same, wouldn't that be a MINOR version?

Let me know your thoughts.



None.

Mar 25 2019, 1:35 am Dem0n Post #2

ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

It's really all just preference. Most of the versions of maps out there don't make any sense. Personally, I'd do a minor increment for every update I do to the map, unless I completely change how the map plays, in which case I might do a major increment.




Mar 25 2019, 6:36 am NudeRaider Post #3

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

For small projects where I don't expect more than around a dozen versions, I just go with a single number.

For larger ones, the first is a major feature update where there is a learning curve because so much has changed.
2nd is a minor feature update that at most add a couple of things here and there.
Third is a bugfix release.

The latter seems pretty similar to the semantic versioning.

Removing just a spell/building/unit would be a minor version imo.




Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[04:56 pm]
RdeRenato -- If someone can help me, it will make me very happy xd
[04:55 pm]
RdeRenato -- they are right. I don't know how to describe my level but it is difficult for two things: 1. crazy enemies 2. multiple defensive points
[11:01 am]
Sie_Sayoka -- both because of low skill and population on west
[11:01 am]
Sie_Sayoka -- tbh a lot of the korean maps are impossible to play with pubs
[05:14 am]
jjf28 -- forcing players to be quicker means they'll have to multi-task more/up the APMs and use less safe approaches or have gotten the approaches down to an art so they can perform them quickly without much time to think
[05:10 am]
jjf28 -- I'd say best way to increase difficulty is to make the enemy units behave smarter, followed by forcing humans to move quicker (timers, or some mechanism forcing them forward), followed by beefing numbers/stats
[03:39 am]
jjf28 -- a huge part of special forces is game knowledge, mapping out the spawn timings, what triggers different traps, what units combine into others, they're definitely not intended to be friendly games
[2020-3-30. : 11:07 pm]
lil-Inferno -- RdeRenato
RdeRenato shouted: people, how do you do to verify a super difficult level if you play bad? :(
get someone better than you to play it
[2020-3-30. : 10:16 pm]
MTiger156 -- Sadly, I've often seen the exact opposite happen. "Special Forces" maps typically try to kill the entire team within the first 60 seconds... try to stay away from that approach.
[2020-3-30. : 10:05 pm]
MTiger156 -- ahh... philosophy of Difficulty. There is no single answer for "how much is enough?". That should be left to the players, thus I highly recommend multiple Difficulty Modes for PvE maps.
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: UEDCommander, CaptainWill, Roy, Doodan, dalajlama159361, seopro013cw