Staredit Network > Forums > Games > Topic: Trap Labs - game that I made based off StarCraft bounds
Trap Labs - game that I made based off StarCraft bounds
Dec 13 2016, 8:55 pm
By: Ninja_Gah  

Dec 13 2016, 8:55 pm Ninja_Gah Post #1



hi people I'm actually here looking for people who were StarCraft 1 veterans that played bounding maps back in the day.

I have a work in progress game called Trap Labs that is pretty much based around the bounding mechanics. I was hoping I could get some feedback regarding the feel of the game

The game is now on Steam Greenlight. Please support me if you like what you see. I'll just leave a trailer here you'll see how it's similar to bounds, especially with the music map at the second half of this trailer:



Full gallery here

Post has been edited 3 time(s), last time on Feb 5 2017, 7:49 am by Ninja_Gah.



None.

Feb 5 2017, 7:49 am Ninja_Gah Post #2



The game is now on Steam Greenlight. Please support me if you like what you see.



None.

Feb 5 2017, 2:54 pm Zycorax Post #3

Grand Moderator of the Games Forum

I've never been big on bounds (mostly because I suck at them), but this looks like a solid little game. I especially like the clean, simple art style. Good luck on Greenlight ;)




Feb 5 2017, 3:48 pm Corbo Post #4

ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO

Fuck yeah. I was and am a big fan of bounds. If I did not have to go out right now I would check it out ASAP but I will at night. Cool.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Feb 6 2017, 12:34 am by Corbo.




Feb 5 2017, 8:18 pm Sand Wraith Post #5

she*

I UPVOTED YOUR GAME.

Also: http://i.imgur.com/Asga4LO.png -> Pure fucking gold. COMRADE. MORE CAPITALS, MORE RESPECT.

I UPVOTE THIS COMMUNIST GAME!!!!




Feb 6 2017, 1:05 am Corbo Post #6

ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO

Very easy levels. Haven't tried the multiplayer but it sounds like a lot of fun.

IMO the talking thing on the top is very disturbing, having known what to do from SC bounds I paid no attention to them but I think that if you do not want to ditch them altogether you should find a way to incorporate them in a better way because they get in the way of the puzzles most of the time becuase they are set to disappear on click and clicking also sends the command for your character to move, so you move and die or you have to click twice once to disregard it and once to actually send your character the place you want it to be.

SINGLE player is pretty cheatable, the switches, in my opinion, should reset when you die because for some levels, specially symmetric ones they're solved faster if after getting into a switch you just die to respawn at the beacon thing instead of actually doing the level. That for me is a bit like cheating, having lives would disencourage it but not stop it.


EDIT:
ALSO, I might add it's pretty strange that when you toggle all switches the traps stop, makes sense but those platform things that make you move should be disabled too then, no?

EDIT2:
Level 3 took a few tries but the pattern's pretty easy, you barely even have to move and that's kind of the key xD Also, by playing it too many times I managed to bug out the music (have not been able to reprduce the error, though) and only SFX played which made it easier.

When can I try multiplayer?

Post has been edited 3 time(s), last time on Feb 6 2017, 5:20 am by Corbo.




Feb 15 2017, 5:31 am Ninja_Gah Post #7



Holy crap I didn't expect any attention as no one replied when I first posted in December. Thanks for the support!

Sorry for the late reply


Quote from Corbo
Very easy levels. Haven't tried the multiplayer but it sounds like a lot of fun.

IMO the talking thing on the top is very disturbing, having known what to do from SC bounds I paid no attention to them but I think that if you do not want to ditch them altogether you should find a way to incorporate them in a better way because they get in the way of the puzzles most of the time becuase they are set to disappear on click and clicking also sends the command for your character to move, so you move and die or you have to click twice once to disregard it and once to actually send your character the place you want it to be.

SINGLE player is pretty cheatable, the switches, in my opinion, should reset when you die because for some levels, specially symmetric ones they're solved faster if after getting into a switch you just die to respawn at the beacon thing instead of actually doing the level. That for me is a bit like cheating, having lives would disencourage it but not stop it.


EDIT:
ALSO, I might add it's pretty strange that when you toggle all switches the traps stop, makes sense but those platform things that make you move should be disabled too then, no?

EDIT2:
Level 3 took a few tries but the pattern's pretty easy, you barely even have to move and that's kind of the key xD Also, by playing it too many times I managed to bug out the music (have not been able to reprduce the error, though) and only SFX played which made it easier.

When can I try multiplayer?

I too felt it was easy but, but what I found from playtesting is that the levels are actually quite hard for most people. It's probably just us bound veterans who think its easy :)

I haven't added scoring system yet. So once scoring is added it'll discourage people from dying on purpose.

I'm going remake the dialog. Like you many complained it was too intrusive.

The conveyor belts are not traps, it's just another floor type.

As for multiplayer I haven't yet optimized the networking for WAN play. So the footage you saw were all LAN based. If the game is greenlit I'll fast track the multiplayer build.

thanks for all the feedback!



None.

Feb 15 2017, 7:43 am Sand Wraith Post #8

she*

I heard that Steam Greenlight is shutting down. Will that affect your game?




Feb 15 2017, 9:00 pm Ninja_Gah Post #9



Quote from Sand Wraith
I heard that Steam Greenlight is shutting down. Will that affect your game?

Probably. It's unfortunate they announced the end of Greenlight right after I launched my campaign lol. They haven't announced what they'll do with existing campaigns so I'll just have to wait and see.



None.

Feb 15 2017, 11:05 pm Corbo Post #10

ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO

I still want my early access to multiplayer, though. :sly:




Feb 16 2017, 6:02 pm Ninja_Gah Post #11



Quote from Corbo
I still want my early access to multiplayer, though. :sly:

when I finish optimizing the game for WAN you'll be the first to know :)



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[05:02 pm]
jjf28 -- NudeRaider
NudeRaider shouted: jjf28 lol the safe browser of my anti virus program can display it. But if I'm not missing anything it's just an image. I ask again, why not use a common format for that?
NudeRaider
NudeRaider shouted: Don't have Chrome. :/ Doesn't seem to like other browsers. Why such a niche format?
for issues with the product please contact the manufacturer, I'm just the delivery man
[04:47 pm]
NudeRaider -- rockz
rockz shouted: Better question is why is webm an accepted standard and webp not?
maybe because picture formats are much more standardized than movie formats and there really is no need for another.
[04:37 pm]
m.0.n.3.y -- Is there a way to detect when a player brings a hallucinated unit to location X?
[04:25 pm]
DarkenedFantasies -- Mini Moose 2707
Mini Moose 2707 shouted: DarkenedFantasies So ... left to right and then by unit ID as a tiebreaker and not really top to bottom at all? :P
Technically, yea. I guess on second thought it really doesn't make sense to say top-to-bottom... so left to right, and newest to oldest (I don't know if it's by the unit ID or what, though).
[03:56 pm]
rockz -- Better question is why is webm an accepted standard and webp not?
[03:02 pm]
NudeRaider -- jjf28
jjf28 shouted: NudeRaider open in chrome?
lol the safe browser of my anti virus program can display it. But if I'm not missing anything it's just an image. I ask again, why not use a common format for that?
[02:49 pm]
NudeRaider -- Don't have Chrome. :/ Doesn't seem to like other browsers. Why such a niche format?
[02:43 pm]
jjf28 -- NudeRaider
NudeRaider shouted: jjf28 how do you watch that?
open in chrome?
[02:29 pm]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- Mini Moose 2707
Mini Moose 2707 shouted: DarkenedFantasies So ... left to right and then by unit ID as a tiebreaker and not really top to bottom at all? :P
it's not by id, it'the order that unit entered that horizontal position
[02:25 pm]
NudeRaider -- jjf28 how do you watch that?
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Roy, Suicidal Insanity, jjf28, Dem0n, KYSXD