|
Thanks for the info bro, but dude... People are too brainwashed (E.G. jordaN & Vrael) to realize the truth of things, and will always deny everything because its "out of the box" So its useless to try to change their opinion because they're too arrogant to look at the truth, and come up with false accusations and assumptions, E.G. jordaN and his "rastafarianism" claim. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
So using billions of dollars spent on keeping a drug that doesn't need to be illegal, makes society better? Wouldn't legalizing Marijuana give the united states BILLIONS of dollars to use on other things, instead of spending it on keeping a drug that doesn't need to be illegal, illegal? Where is the logic and reasoning behind spending billions of dollars on something that is harmless over other things this country needs? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
He'll spear your brains if you step out of line.
|
Maybe, that wasn't really my point. Not really, the US just spends stuff on whatever it feels like. If, however, staying out of debt were a priority, then maybe you would have a point. a. Please give me a source showing how much is spent on drugs. Then give me a source showing how much of that is recovered via fines. b. As I said before, the drug has not been shown to be harmless. Nor has it been shown to be harmful. You cannot, therefore, use its "harmlessness" as a premise for your argument. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() [quote=Felagund]The most dangerous weapon anyone can wield is self righteousness.[/quote]
I have a signature yay! |
|
Respected to disrespect.
|
The best part about that story is why in hells name would a good person keep drugs in his car. And once again if they know the consequences why would they make it that easy? I'm Brainwashed? Yea I know, making drugs legal will benefit the world. Ever heard the saying, "You can't force change."? |
|
He'll spear your brains if you step out of line.
|
Nor have I. I have, however, used the potential for harmful effects as an argument. Illustration: Dude: Check out this strange food, we should eat it. Dood: It might be poisonous. Dude: It hasn't been shown to be poisonous, it's fine. Dood: Yes, but neither has it been shown to be harmless. Dude: Look at those guys, they ate it. Dood: Correct, but we have yet to see the long term effects of it on them, or on other people. Dude: It should be fine. Dood: Perhaps, but instead of getting everybody we know to eat it, perhaps we should proceed with more caution. In fact, since we have been fine without it until now, perhaps we should just avoid it all together. Dude: But it hasn't been shown to be harmful. Dood: Yes, we went over this. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() [quote=Felagund]The most dangerous weapon anyone can wield is self righteousness.[/quote]
I have a signature yay! |
|
I don't believe I claimed it would make a perfect society. Either way, I believe legalization can only help our situation, I'm not trying to make a perfect society, just a reasonable one.
One problem, that logic should have no place in this argument because legalization of weed will yield very positive consequences as I have explained. I'm Brainwashed? Yea I know, making drugs legal will benefit the world. Ever heard the saying, "You can't force change."? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() If you aren't outraged, you aren't paying attention.
"You can't tell me who I am cuz I'm working on that too. What's right for me just ain't right for you." Soldiers of Jah Army. |
|
I'm Brainwashed? Yea I know, making drugs legal will benefit the world. Ah, great job at skewing the point of my saying that comment jordaN, excelent work! If you'd learn to think "outside the box" for once (which would require you to think on your own for once) you'd see where I'm comming from. All you spout out is lies and bullshit with no backed proof. All we've given is POSITIVEs of legalizing Marijuana (since when did we start talking about legalizing all drugs????) and you HAVE NOT proven these postitives to be of any bad nature... Except with your continuous bashing and false claims with no proof... You should honestly learn to think for yourself, and research before you partake in anymore Serious Discussion threads within this forum in my opinion.. You just always derail the intelligent discussion with your un-intellectual, unresearched claims and "comebacks" and you never provide a valid argument to the discussion in any discussion you partake in.. Just some advice. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Respected to disrespect.
|
I'll just go ahead and ignore then post anway. No need to reply.
Hmm, it looks like you don't get it so lets replace drugs with stolen money. Now say for example you got a thousand dollars but they are in bills right, so you stash them in your car thinking it's a safe place. Now you get pulled over by the police because you're a Canadian driving in USA. He checks to see if you are drunk and he finds out you're not. Then he opens up one of the compartments only to find money. He then automatically checks his leaflet about this thousand dollars that was stolen. He then arrests you. So what you're trying to say is having stolen/illegal goods in a car is good then I'm not sure how many times you've been smoking. Well, what if the human doesn't like the effects of the drug. Would that mean he would continue using it out of his own consent? |
|
Here to Help
|
This is a totally different situation. You're not fooling anybody. People should stop bothering with your posts with any more than a few sentences in reply until you prove you even try to be logical when posting. Strawman Fallacy I have a lot more replying to do in this topic -- but it'll be when I have some more time later. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Title Pending.
|
[quote=yenku][QUOTE]The smell must be a matter of opinion, even so, that is no reason to keep it illegal.
In the frisbee accident, who's fault is it? The person not watching their child? The child's? The driver's? It is really hard to say, and it's not any one persons fault. Um... I don't ever see stoners speed 68 mph through a residential area... It's not cocaine man.. Also, people who smoke weed, smoke it regardless of the law, there are already people doing it, and in increasing numbers... I support legalization, REGULATION and EDUCATION. Regulation can be a tax, laws for driving, for owning certain amounts, etc. Education will teach people the dangers as well as the positives. Have you seen people high? It doesn't make them stupid, they may slip up a few words, but it doesn't make anyone stupid, loud or obnoxious unless its in their own personality. A cafeteria full of high people won't be louder than a sober one, probably quieter.. [/QUOTE] You're right, the smell is opinion. The fault of the frisbee accident lies solely with the stoned driver, I don't think the little dead girl will get sued for damages to the vehicle... As for what you've seen, your limited perspective on the world does not account for every possibility. I don't mean to attack or slander your perspective, but I believe you're missing out at what would happen if millions of people had access to this stuff. Yes, the people who want it will get it illegally anyway, but why should that support your case? It really doesn't, it's illegal. Besides, this is America, if we want it legalized we have the power. Someone can petition Congress in favor of legalizing. As for the increasing number of people doing it, I'm not a pundit on the matter, but the population of the country is increasing too, so the percentage might not be changing. In adressing the "open thought" and "free society" mumbo-jumbo, why do we need M-J to think better? Eat fish if you're having difficulty processing. Play Brain Age. Save your weed money for something better. I'm obviously anti-legalization, but I can see the benefits for medical patients. I think M-J should be like plutonium: locked away until we need it. There are some non-smoking benefits I would like to have it legalized for, like paper production. As for legalizing the smoking of it, I believe it would be detrimental to the health of society overall, because in a country of over 300 million, free access would increase the danger greatly; people would not be as careful with it as they are now. And @ Kellimus: please do not call me brainwashed; I have cognitively analyzed this matter with my own brain and came to these conclusions. I am not under the impression that wantonly accepting the views of other individuals around me counts as my own perspective. This post was edited 1 time, last edit by Vrael: Dec 27 2007, 3:50 am.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
In the frisbee accident, who's fault is it? The person not watching their child? The child's? The driver's? It is really hard to say, and it's not any one persons fault. Um... I don't ever see stoners speed 68 mph through a residential area... It's not cocaine man.. Also, people who smoke weed, smoke it regardless of the law, there are already people doing it, and in increasing numbers... I support legalization, REGULATION and EDUCATION. Regulation can be a tax, laws for driving, for owning certain amounts, etc. Education will teach people the dangers as well as the positives. Have you seen people high? It doesn't make them stupid, they may slip up a few words, but it doesn't make anyone stupid, loud or obnoxious unless its in their own personality. A cafeteria full of high people won't be louder than a sober one, probably quieter.. You're right, the smell is opinion. The fault of the frisbee accident lies solely with the stoned driver, I don't think the little dead girl will get sued for damages to the vehicle... As for what you've seen, your limited perspective on the world does not account for every possibility. I don't mean to attack or slander your perspective, but I believe you're missing out at what would happen if millions of people had access to this stuff. Yes, the people who want it will get it illegally anyway, but why should that support your case? It really doesn't, it's illegal. Besides, this is America, if we want it legalized we have the power. Someone can petition Congress in favor of legalizing. As for the increasing number of people doing it, I'm not a pundit on the matter, but the population of the country is increasing too, so the percentage might not be changing. In adressing the "open thought" and "free society" mumbo-jumbo, why do we need M-J to think better? Eat fish if you're having difficulty processing. Play Brain Age. Save your weed money for something better. I'm obviously anti-legalization, but I can see the benefits for medical patients. I think M-J should be like plutonium: locked away until we need it. There are some non-smoking benefits I would like to have it legalized for, like paper production. As for legalizing the smoking of it, I believe it would be detrimental to the health of society overall, because in a country of over 300 million, free access would increase the danger greatly; people would not be as careful with it as they are now. And @ Kellimus: please do not call me brainwashed; I have cognitively analyzed this matter with my own brain and came to these conclusions. I am not under the impression that wantonly accepting the views of other individuals around me counts as my own perspective. Sorry, but I believe you are brainwashed. If you honestly believe that a stoned driver drives faster than the speed limit, you've been brainwashed by those "Truth" commercials. You do realize that millions of people already have access too this stuff, don't you? Our whole nation is full of druggies, be them pot-heads or meth-heads. Please do more research before you spout out lies, thank you ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Well, what if the human doesn't like the effects of the drug. Would that mean he would continue using it out of his own consent? And @ Kellimus: please do not call me brainwashed; I have cognitively analyzed this matter with my own brain and came to these conclusions. I am not under the impression that wantonly accepting the views of other individuals around me counts as my own perspective. This is also a matter of freedom. It is our god-given right to use substances such as marihuana. I'm sick of all the double-standards in this society. People are addicted to caffeine, alcohol, muscle relaxers, pain killers and mother f--king cheese burgers from mccy d's, damnit. I don't see why marihuana is so fucking bad in society's eyes. You still don't acknowledge the fact that proper regulation and education will keep such events as the car accident from even happening. It could happen with weed legal or not. Alcohol is the drug to be worried about with use during driving. There were more fatal injuries from alcohol when it was illegal than when it became legal again in the 30's. People didn't worry about driving drunk, people made their own and died from it or became blind or went through every kind of organ failure there was until they got safe alcohol again. Now you see that drug legalization means more safety for the users and who they users come in contact with. Not exactly. The only change I did to the scenario was replace drugs with money(and the leaflet). It would be totally different if the person deposited the money in the bank which you can't do with drugs. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() If you aren't outraged, you aren't paying attention.
"You can't tell me who I am cuz I'm working on that too. What's right for me just ain't right for you." Soldiers of Jah Army. |
|
Title Pending.
|
I need to learn how to use the quote function lol @ Kellimus: Truth commercials? I don't watch TV much lol (but yes I've seen them, and they're about tobacco, not weed). Usually I watch the specials on galaxies and stuff so.. w00t for that! I'm not brainwashed, thank you very much. Before you accuse me of lying, I would like you to do some research on the subject. Go out into the world and survey a few million Americans; after you have your own hard data then you can accuse me of such. Besides, most of what I "spouted out" was opinion. Regarding the "millions who have access" yes, I believe roughly everybody has "access" to it. That's quite a different concept from legalized access where you could go down to the corner store everyday and buy some. Besides, being high impairs judgement, a high person is much more likely to drive at 70 mph than a fully cogent driver. It's the same with alcohol and more recently cell phones. That's why they're illegal. (Cell phones in N. Jersey). I would appreciate it if you could keep your posts regarding me to relevant issues either supporting or refuting the legalization of M-J, and not to attacking my character. @Yenku: Thanks for being more than a pot-head. I realize much of your views are based in the rights and freedoms that should be naturally given to us. I almost agree with you. If the majority of people could smoke it without affecting anyone else, in fact I would support your case. However, I don't think you can deny the effects it would have on the rest of society |