You (they, and their flawed beliefs) also have not considered that we are Human, not robots made aware with internal circuits designed for freedom ravings.
Quote from payne
How is anarchism so fatally flawed?
Self-sufficiency of small groups of people organizing themselves based on direct democracy really doesn't seems flawed to me. A small group of people wanting to take over the rest would just eventually get torn apart by the rest of the population... and the only fact that the whole system would be based upon the fact that people organize themselves in small groups would probably prevent people from wanting to take the control over.
EDIT: And who talked of disorder? As far as I've read about anarchy, it's not about "No laws/rules/order" at all. It's about "No rulers". There's a huge difference. And in fact, there are rulers: the whole population itself.
Direct democracy looks like a very good way to manage stuff together, in the order and equity.
This post was edited 1 time, last edit by payne: Mar 29 2011, 8:12 pm.
Self-sufficiency of small groups of people organizing themselves based on direct democracy really doesn't seems flawed to me. A small group of people wanting to take over the rest would just eventually get torn apart by the rest of the population... and the only fact that the whole system would be based upon the fact that people organize themselves in small groups would probably prevent people from wanting to take the control over.
EDIT: And who talked of disorder? As far as I've read about anarchy, it's not about "No laws/rules/order" at all. It's about "No rulers". There's a huge difference. And in fact, there are rulers: the whole population itself.
Direct democracy looks like a very good way to manage stuff together, in the order and equity.
This post was edited 1 time, last edit by payne: Mar 29 2011, 8:12 pm.
Quote
In fact, it wouldn't go against anarchist principle: it is part of their beliefs. No one really know about this since there are very few that actually tried to understand deeply this political view.
Quote
If I understood properly, people aren't supposed to rally themselves on ultra-large scales because then the system implodes due to the difficulties to apply properly direct democracy on extremely large number of people. And since anarchy is based on the fact that people want to live free of any form of oppression, they wouldn't want to rally up on large-scale because it'd imply the loss of their current political freedom.
In fact, the theory is so retarded that most aren't interested, why? Because of the values it places on individuality, and how it also emphasizes on scattering population into miniature groups. It doesn't work that way. The smaller your group is, the more interdependent individuals become in that group. That in itself is a contradiction- which most people find it in instant repulsive reactions. There is no need to deeply understand a political view that has no feasible roots to begin with.
None.