Staredit Network > Forums > Lite Discussion > Topic: .xxx domain names
.xxx domain names
Dec 11 2010, 1:42 am
By: Forsaken Archer  

Dec 12 2010, 11:32 pm Lanthanide Post #21



Quote from poison_us
Especially since kids don't have access to a credit card, which is honestly all the porn industry really cares about. I mean, they don't provide full access for free, you know.
Except that there are of course many free porn sites out there, that presumably get their money from advertising. Advertising that works just as well (perhaps, better) on children as it does on adults. Also sites like xtube and such, where the content isn't actually created by any one company. Finally, almost all of the websites that do require CC payment also have 'free tour' sections, which in terms of 'harm to children' is sufficient to want to block the site.



None.

Dec 13 2010, 1:28 am payne Post #22

:payne:

Quote from Vrael
Children who have not gone through puberty are not physically ready for sex. Viewing pornographic material might suggest to them to engage in activities which could be harmful to them. I think there's a pretty wide consensus that we don't want our children having, dealing with, or watching sex.
Babies do masturbate at the age of like 1-2 years old, but I admit I hadn't seen it in a way that they could try some of the things they see, which might in the end be harmful to them.



None.

Dec 13 2010, 2:05 am Vrael Post #23



Quote from payne
Quote from Vrael
Children who have not gone through puberty are not physically ready for sex. Viewing pornographic material might suggest to them to engage in activities which could be harmful to them. I think there's a pretty wide consensus that we don't want our children having, dealing with, or watching sex.
Babies do masturbate at the age of like 1-2 years old, but I admit I hadn't seen it in a way that they could try some of the things they see, which might in the end be harmful to them.
Pre-pubescent sex can be especially harmful to young girls. Babies masturbating is irrelevant if its natural, though I have never heard of that and it seems real strange.



None.

Dec 13 2010, 2:10 am Centreri Post #24

Relatively ancient and inactive

.... Babies masturbate? Wut?



None.

Dec 13 2010, 5:13 am DT_Battlekruser Post #25



I though the controversy was always that "children viewing porn" was always legally defined to be anyone under 18 viewing porn, not just children before puberty. Puberty tends to hit a lot before 18.



None.

Dec 13 2010, 5:17 am payne Post #26

:payne:

Quote from Vrael
Babies masturbating is irrelevant if its natural, though I have never heard of that and it seems real strange.
It's moderately "common".

http://www.babycentre.co.uk/toddler/development/socialemotional/masturbation/



None.

Dec 13 2010, 5:21 am DavidJCobb Post #27



Quote from payne
What's wrong with kids seeing pornographic content anyways? >_>
Quote from payne
My point is that one of the listed "advantages" of having a .xxx domain is to be able to easily prevent children from seeing that kind of website. In my opinion, I'm not seeing how seeing such a website can harm a kid, thus making this advantage pretty weak to my eyes.
Children that view pornographic content can end up developing some... deviant... interests, along with a large amount of pathological shame regarding those interests and, more generally, their own sexuality. They can also end up with a kind of aversion to sexual topics and in some cases even a reluctance to use certain words that have connections to sexuality (i.e. "vagina").

Please just trust me, payne.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:06 am]
NudeRaider -- KrayZee
KrayZee shouted: Voyager7456 Somehow I misread your shout. "Glad I can entertain you in Nude" as if you sent a racy photo, video or something.
nah, he just made a comment that had us laughing very hard.
[06:02 am]
NudeRaider -- Zoan
Zoan shouted: sraw531 you can’t move buildings afaik
yes you can.
[2019-10-16. : 10:03 pm]
Dem0n -- no
[2019-10-16. : 8:26 pm]
GGmano -- Is here a forum only for temple siege?
[2019-10-16. : 4:20 pm]
KrayZee -- Voyager7456
Voyager7456 shouted: Glad I can entertain you Nude
Somehow I misread your shout. "Glad I can entertain you in Nude" as if you sent a racy photo, video or something.
[2019-10-16. : 2:26 pm]
martosss -- Moose
Moose shouted: martosss IIRC, the plan was to go 64-bit only eventually so they're interested in differences between the versions
well I might have found 1 bug for them to fix - some maps load on 32 bit, but not on 64 bit game version
[2019-10-16. : 2:19 pm]
Zoan -- sraw531
sraw531 shouted: I'm pretty sure you would move the building away at some point. When you do so, you can give it to someone else. I was thinking nexi because its possible you could encourage the computer to expand to a specific spot
you can’t move buildings afaik
[2019-10-16. : 10:10 am]
Moose -- martosss
martosss shouted: jjf28 OK, I have 1 more question - are you using 32 bit SC:R or 64 bit ? In game settings there's an option to switch to 32, is it checked? I just tried hosting the map with 64-bit SC:R and it failed... I ticked the option to use 32 bit SC:R => it worked and map was hosted. So I guess the issue still exists for 64 bit SC:R ? I also tried calling a friend and he couldn't see the map when he entered the lobby. Weird, I might have to report this to Blizzard?
IIRC, the plan was to go 64-bit only eventually so they're interested in differences between the versions
[2019-10-16. : 5:27 am]
O)FaRTy1billion[MM] -- or a magic box :(
[2019-10-16. : 3:31 am]
martosss -- FaRTy1billion
FaRTy1billion shouted: how about 5 minerals
you can't even get a scarab with those!
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Roy, Dem0n