We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Those kind of tests imply (some even explicitly state it) that if the situation described doesn't fit your circumstances that you imagine yourself how you'd react in them. Similar how you can replace the reading book hobby with playing video games.
Look what I found:
My topic from 2011On my first post I listed all the people here who'd taken the test under their personality type. Will be interesting to see if people have "changed".
For example, Kame has changed from ISTJ to INTJ.
None.
I got
INTP: Introvert(78%) iNtuitive(34%) Thinking(38%) Perceiving(3%)
J/P were basically even, apparently. I think I identify more with the INTP description more, but the INTJ describes some social/interpersonal things which are totally absent in the INTP description. xD
I agree with Ex, but I tried to generalize some of those questions (like "reading a book" to mean any thoughtful solitary activity, such as a video game).
Yeah I'd say you're definitely INTP. I also am
None.
i got intp on these sorts of tests in the past but more recently it's infp.
if i try to be as mean as possible i get j instead of p
INFP is probably correct I'd say. INFP are pretty good artists!
None.
Math + Physics + StarCraft = Zoan
I got ISFP/ISTP. Used to be INTJ I think.
INFP is probably correct I'd say. INFP are pretty good artists!
tbh how the fuck did I manage to get myself an ISTJ in the old thread? i must have been really closeted, sheesh.
I may be artistic but I sure do suck at art lol!
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
Apparently I'm ENTP-A, pretty sure that's significantly different than last time I tried one of these. Don't agree 100% with the conclusions but seems halfway right.
71% Extraverted
60% Intuitive
61% Thinking
70% Prospecting
87% Assertive
The description of personality seems akin to the
Barnum effect though.
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
Thank you for taking this seriously, Vrael. We all appreciate your input.
Let me show you how to hump without making love.
Oh we were doing this stuff again?
ENTP-T
EDIT: Took the test again and got something completely different. Fuck this thing.
Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Apr 11 2017, 6:36 am by LoveLess.
None.
"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Oh we were doing this stuff again?
ENTP-T
EDIT: Took the test again and got something completely different. Fuck this thing.
Try
mine. It
seems to be way more accurate, but without more people commenting on their results this could be coincidence.
So which personality type is best for making maps, heh
None.
We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch
Nice
Would you guys mind trying to evaluate the validity of the test? Ist it mostly generic statements, or worse, outright wrong, or does it describe you fairly well?