Especially since kids don't have access to a credit card, which is honestly all the porn industry really cares about. I mean, they don't provide full access for free, you know.
Except that there are of course many free porn sites out there, that presumably get their money from advertising. Advertising that works just as well (perhaps, better) on children as it does on adults. Also sites like xtube and such, where the content isn't actually created by any one company. Finally, almost all of the websites that do require CC payment also have 'free tour' sections, which in terms of 'harm to children' is sufficient to want to block the site.
None.
Children who have not gone through puberty are not physically ready for sex. Viewing pornographic material might suggest to them to engage in activities which could be harmful to them. I think there's a pretty wide consensus that we don't want our children having, dealing with, or watching sex.
Babies do masturbate at the age of like 1-2 years old, but I admit I hadn't seen it in a way that they could try some of the things they see, which might in the end be harmful to them.
None.
Children who have not gone through puberty are not physically ready for sex. Viewing pornographic material might suggest to them to engage in activities which could be harmful to them. I think there's a pretty wide consensus that we don't want our children having, dealing with, or watching sex.
Babies do masturbate at the age of like 1-2 years old, but I admit I hadn't seen it in a way that they could try some of the things they see, which might in the end be harmful to them.
Pre-pubescent sex can be especially harmful to young girls. Babies masturbating is irrelevant if its natural, though I have never heard of that and it seems real strange.
None.
Relatively ancient and inactive
.... Babies masturbate? Wut?
None.
Babies masturbating is irrelevant if its natural, though I have never heard of that and it seems real strange.
It's moderately "common".
http://www.babycentre.co.uk/toddler/development/socialemotional/masturbation/
None.
What's wrong with kids seeing pornographic content anyways? >_>
My point is that one of the listed "advantages" of having a .xxx domain is to be able to easily prevent children from seeing that kind of website. In my opinion, I'm not seeing how seeing such a website can harm a kid, thus making this advantage pretty weak to my eyes.
Children that view pornographic content can end up developing some... deviant... interests, along with a large amount of pathological shame regarding those interests and, more generally, their own sexuality. They can also end up with a kind of aversion to sexual topics and in some cases even a reluctance to use certain words that have connections to sexuality (i.e. "vagina").
Please just trust me, payne.
None.