It really depends what your doing. To be fair I think we can all agree that making art and modifying imaged are on slightly different levels. True if you take one away the other one will falter. But let's be honest, You can do things by hands IF anything. Artistic skills > Photoshop skills. I mean photoshop as created to edit images and manipulate them right? For the most part you'd be using artistic RESOURCES in the first place. I'm not like a Photoshop basher or anything because I used to photoshop and do things that aren't even considered art by the standards that I talked about.

Oh no, you CAN make art with photoshop. There's this artistic movement right now called, originally, "Digital art". Involves art pieces done with digital software and not old school canvas and oils. But just like with every other single art piece you have to know what art is, study art, know how to use all the concepts involving it and so on. Not just because you have the ability to click and paint with cool brushes you just downloaded it will turn out to be art.
In the end, photoshop's just a tool, and it'll do what you tell it to do. The oils are just a tool too and you'll tell them what to do.
I personally hate with all my hearth every single kid that grabs photoshop applies some edgy filter to a photo and calls it art but there are other who CAN use the tools and actually know how to artistically express themselves through a computer.

If you really want to make art, you don't use Photoshop, you use Illustrator.

GIMP FOR THE WIN!

PAINT + WINDOWS GALLERY

JUST FUCKIN' PAINT.

SHITTY, DUMBED DOWN MAC PAINT!

PAINTDOTNET

Let's get this back on topic.



I would like to stress that I don't normally dress like that.

Very nice telecaster CaptainWill, interesting costume i presume as well haha.

So Will also plays the guitar! Dun dun dun.

Really?

The other picture you posted before had basically the same clothing combination and you were going to a date

I didn't actually wear those clothes then. It was pre-party silliness.

Right

Well you should. >:O

This worried me a little: On the left - me aged 17, not long after I was first using SEN I guess. On the right, me a couple of days ago.

I need to get a new expression for photos I think.

It is obviously a different type of light so it doesn't help to your skin tone, though you ARE paler and it doesn't look normal pale but more like sick-pale seeing that you also look a lot more thinner than before, though you do look older.

It's the same pale as Eoin Colfer describes Artemis Fowl with.

At least your hair looks better.

Quite - that was before I started growing it for the first time.